Radeon R5 Graphics IGP vs GeForce GT 240

Radeon R5 Graphics IGP
Memory: 0Mb System SharedDESKTOP
Release date: 14 Jun 2014
Radeon R5 Graphics IGP
GeForce GT 240
Memory: 1024Mb GDDR5DESKTOP
Release date: 17 Nov 2009
GeForce GT 240

Summary

Reasons to consider Radeon R5 Graphics IGP

54 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce GT 240 .
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support.

Reasons to consider GeForce GT 240

Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications
PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor

No clear winner declared

We have no data to declare a winner at this time.


Specifications

Core Configuration

Radeon R5 Graphics IGPGeForce GT 240
GPU NameMullins ()vsGT215 (GT215-450-A2)
Fab Process28 nmvs40 nm
Die Size0 mm²vs144 mm²
Transistorsunknownvs727 million
Shaders128vs96
Compute Units2vs4
Core clock800 MHzvs550 MHz
ROPs4vs8
TMUs8vs32

Memory Configuration

Radeon R5 Graphics IGPGeForce GT 240
Memory TypeSystem SharedvsGDDR5
Bus WidthSystem Sharedvs128 bit
Memory SpeedSystem Sharedvs850 MHz
3400 MHz effective
Memory Size0 Mbvs1024 Mb

Additional details

Radeon R5 Graphics IGPGeForce GT 240
TDP15 wattsvs69 watts
Release Date14 Jun 2014vs17 Nov 2009

Raw Performance comparison

Pixel Rate

  • Radeon R5 Graphics IGP
    3.20 GP/s
  • GeForce GT 240
    4.40 GP/s

GigaPixels - higher is better

Texel Rate

  • Radeon R5 Graphics IGP
    6.40 GT/s
  • GeForce GT 240
    17.60 GT/s

GigaTexels - higher is better

Memory bandwidth

  • Radeon R5 Graphics IGP
    0.00 GB/s
  • GeForce GT 240
    54.40 GB/s

GB/s - higher is better

Single precision performance

  • Radeon R5 Graphics IGP
    204.80 GFLOPs
  • GeForce GT 240
    257.30 GFLOPs

GFLOPs - higher is better