Radeon R6 Graphics IGP vs GeForce GTS 250

Radeon R6 Graphics IGP
Memory: 0Mb System SharedDESKTOP
Release date: 17 Sep 2014
Radeon R6 Graphics IGP
GeForce GTS 250
Memory: 1024Mb GDDR3DESKTOP
Release date: 4 Mar 2009
GeForce GTS 250

Summary

Reasons to consider Radeon R6 Graphics IGP

135 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce GTS 250 .
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support.

Reasons to consider GeForce GTS 250

Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications.
PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor.

No clear winner declared

We have no data to declare a winner at this time.


Specifications

Core Configuration

Radeon R6 Graphics IGPGeForce GTS 250
GPU NameSpectre ()vsG92B (G92-428-B1)
Fab Process28 nmvs55 nm
Die Size245 mm²vs260 mm²
Transistors2,410 millionvs754 million
Shaders384vs128
Compute Units6vs8
Core clock533 MHzvs702 MHz
ROPs8vs16
TMUs24vs64

Memory Configuration

Radeon R6 Graphics IGPGeForce GTS 250
Memory TypeSystem SharedvsGDDR3
Bus WidthSystem Sharedvs256 bit
Memory SpeedSystem Sharedvs1000 MHz
2000 MHz effective
Memory Size0 Mbvs1024 Mb

Additional details

Radeon R6 Graphics IGPGeForce GTS 250
TDP15 wattsvs150 watts
Release Date17 Sep 2014vs4 Mar 2009

Raw Performance comparison

Pixel Rate

  • Radeon R6 Graphics IGP
    4.26 GP/s
  • GeForce GTS 250
    11.20 GP/s

GigaPixels - higher is better

Texel Rate

  • Radeon R6 Graphics IGP
    12.80 GT/s
  • GeForce GTS 250
    44.90 GT/s

GigaTexels - higher is better

Memory bandwidth

  • Radeon R6 Graphics IGP
    0.00 GB/s
  • GeForce GTS 250
    64.00 GB/s

GB/s - higher is better

Single precision performance

  • Radeon R6 Graphics IGP
    409.30 GFLOPs
  • GeForce GTS 250
    387.10 GFLOPs

GFLOPs - higher is better