Radeon R7 250X vs Radeon R7 350 OEM

Radeon R7 250X
Memory: 1024Mb GDDR5 DESKTOP
Release date: 13 Feb 2014
Radeon R7 250X
Radeon R7 350 OEM
Memory: 1024Mb GDDR5 DESKTOP
Release date: 5 May 2015
Radeon R7 350 OEM

Summary

Reasons to consider Radeon R7 250X

Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute.
Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty).
Supports Mantle.

Reasons to consider Radeon R7 350 OEM

This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support.
Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute.
Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty).
Supports Mantle.

No clear winner declared

We have no data to declare a winner at this time.

Specifications

Core Configuration

Radeon R7 250X Radeon R7 350 OEM
GPU Name Cape Verde (Cape Verde XT) vs Oland (Oland XT)
Fab Process 28 nm vs 28 nm
Die Size 123 mm² vs 90 mm²
Transistors 1,500 million vs 1,040 million
Shaders 640 vs 384
Compute Units 10 vs 6
Core clock 950 MHz vs 1000 MHz
ROPs 16 vs 8
TMUs 40 vs 24

Memory Configuration

Radeon R7 250X Radeon R7 350 OEM
Memory Type GDDR5 vs GDDR5
Bus Width 128 bit vs 128 bit
Memory Speed 1125 MHz
4500 MHz effective
vs 1125 MHz
4500 MHz effective
Memory Size 1024 Mb vs 1024 Mb

Additional details

Radeon R7 250X Radeon R7 350 OEM
TDP 80 watts vs 65 watts
Release Date 13 Feb 2014 vs 5 May 2015

Raw Performance comparison

Pixel Rate

  • Radeon R7 250X
    15.20 GP/s
  • Radeon R7 350 OEM
    8.00 GP/s

GigaPixels - higher is better

Texel Rate

  • Radeon R7 250X
    38.00 GT/s
  • Radeon R7 350 OEM
    24.00 GT/s

GigaTexels - higher is better

Memory bandwidth

  • Radeon R7 250X
    72.00 GB/s
  • Radeon R7 350 OEM
    72.00 GB/s

GB/s - higher is better

Single precision performance

  • Radeon R7 250X
    1216.00 GFLOPs
  • Radeon R7 350 OEM
    768.00 GFLOPs

GFLOPs - higher is better