Radeon R7 265X OEM vs Radeon R9 270 1024SP
Summary
Reasons to consider Radeon R7 265X OEM |
| Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
| Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Supports Mantle |
| Based on an outdated architecture (AMD GCN), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider Radeon R9 270 1024SP |
| Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
| Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Supports Mantle |
| Based on an outdated architecture (AMD GCN), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
No clear winner declared
We have no data to declare a winner at this time.
Core Configuration
| Radeon R7 265X OEM | | Radeon R9 270 1024SP | |
|---|
| GPU Name | Curacao (Curacao PRO) | vs | Pitcairn (Pitcairn PRO) |
| Fab Process | 28 nm | vs | 28 nm |
| Die Size | 212 mm² | vs | 212 mm² |
| Transistors | 2,800 million | vs | 2,800 million |
| Shaders | 1280 | vs | 1024 |
| Compute Units | 20 | vs | 16 |
| Core clock | 900 MHz | vs | 900 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | vs | 32 |
| TMUs | 80 | vs | 64 |
Memory Configuration
| Radeon R7 265X OEM | | Radeon R9 270 1024SP | |
|---|
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | vs | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256 bit | vs | 256 bit |
| Memory Speed | 1400 MHz
5600 MHz effective | vs | 1200 MHz
4800 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 2048 Mb | vs | 2048 Mb |
Additional details
| Radeon R7 265X OEM | | Radeon R9 270 1024SP | |
|---|
| TDP | 150 watts | vs | 150 watts |
| Release Date | 12 Aug 2014 | vs | 13 Mar 2015 |
Radeon R7 265X OEM
28.80 GP/s
Radeon R9 270 1024SP
29.60 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
Radeon R7 265X OEM
72.00 GT/s
Radeon R9 270 1024SP
59.20 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
Radeon R7 265X OEM
179.00 GB/s
Radeon R9 270 1024SP
153.60 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
Radeon R7 265X OEM
2304.00 GFLOPs
Radeon R9 270 1024SP
1894.40 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better