Radeon RX 6700 vs GeForce GTX 1080
Summary
Reasons to consider Radeon RX 6700 |
| 60 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce GTX 1080 . |
| Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
| Supports FreeSync |
| Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Infinity Cache allows to deliver up to 3.25x the effective memory bandwidth |
| Supports DirectX Raytracing (DXR) |
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 1080 |
| Supports PhysX |
| Supports G-Sync |
| Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Pascal), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
No clear winner declared
We have no data to declare a winner at this time.
Core Configuration
| Radeon RX 6700 | | GeForce GTX 1080 | |
|---|
| GPU Name | Navi 22 (Navi 22 XL) | vs | GP104 (GP104-400-A1) |
| Fab Process | 7 nm | vs | 16 nm |
| Die Size | 0 mm² | vs | 314 mm² |
| Transistors | unknown | vs | 7,200 million |
| Shaders | 2304 | vs | 2560 |
| Compute Units | 36 | vs | 20 |
| Core clock | 1489 MHz | vs | 1607 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | vs | 64 |
| TMUs | 144 | vs | 160 |
Memory Configuration
| Radeon RX 6700 | | GeForce GTX 1080 | |
|---|
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | vs | GDDR5X |
| Bus Width | 192 bit | vs | 256 bit |
| Memory Speed | 2000 MHz
16 Gbps effective | vs | 1251 MHz
10008 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 12288 Mb | vs | 8192 Mb |
Additional details
| Radeon RX 6700 | | GeForce GTX 1080 | |
|---|
| TDP | 120 watts | vs | 180 watts |
| Release Date | UNRELEASED | vs | 27 May 2016 |
Radeon RX 6700
128.00 GP/s
GeForce GTX 1080
102.80 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
Radeon RX 6700
288.00 GT/s
GeForce GTX 1080
257.10 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
Radeon RX 6700
384.00 GB/s
GeForce GTX 1080
320.00 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
Radeon RX 6700
9216.00 GFLOPs
GeForce GTX 1080
8228.00 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better