Radeon VII vs GeForce GTX TITAN X (Pascal)
Summary
Reasons to consider Radeon VII |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
| Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
| Supports FreeSync |
| Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Supports TrueAudio |
| Based on an outdated architecture (AMD GCN), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX TITAN X (Pascal) |
| 45 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the Radeon VII . |
| Supports PhysX |
| Supports G-Sync |
| Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Pascal), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
No clear winner declared
These graphics cards seems to have comparable performance based on the game benchmark suite used (30 combinations of games and resolutions).
Core Configuration
| Radeon VII | | GeForce GTX TITAN X (Pascal) | |
|---|
| GPU Name | Vega 20 (Vega 20 XT) | vs | GP102 (GP102) |
| Fab Process | 7 nm | vs | 16 nm |
| Die Size | 331 mm² | vs | 471 mm² |
| Transistors | 13,230 million | vs | 12,000 million |
| Shaders | 3840 | vs | 3584 |
| Compute Units | 60 | vs | 28 |
| Core clock | 1450 MHz | vs | 1417 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | vs | 96 |
| TMUs | 240 | vs | 224 |
Memory Configuration
| Radeon VII | | GeForce GTX TITAN X (Pascal) | |
|---|
| Memory Type | HBM2 | vs | GDDR5X |
| Bus Width | 4096 bit | vs | 384 bit |
| Memory Speed | 1000 MHz
2000 MHz effective | vs | 1251 MHz
10008 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 16384 Mb | vs | 12288 Mb |
Additional details
| Radeon VII | | GeForce GTX TITAN X (Pascal) | |
|---|
| TDP | 295 watts | vs | 250 watts |
| Release Date | 7 Feb 2019 | vs | 2 Aug 2016 |
GigaPixels - higher is better
GigaTexels - higher is better
GFLOPs - higher is better
Ultra quality TTA DirectX11 Windows10 x64
FPS (higher is better)
Highest quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality DirectX12 Windows10 x64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64
FPS (higher is better)
DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF, 2xMSAA
FPS (higher is better)
Very high quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, HR Textures, DirectX11, Windows 10 x64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality DirectX12 Windows10 x64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Async Compute ,Windows 10x64
FPS (higher is better)
DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality TTA DirectX11 Windows10 x64
FPS (higher is better)
Highest quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality DirectX12 Windows10 x64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64
FPS (higher is better)
DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF, 2xMSAA
FPS (higher is better)
Very high quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, HR Textures, DirectX11, Windows 10 x64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality DirectX12 Windows10 x64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Async Compute ,Windows 10x64
FPS (higher is better)
DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality TTA DirectX11 Windows10 x64
FPS (higher is better)
Highest quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality DirectX12 Windows10 x64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64
FPS (higher is better)
DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF, 2xMSAA
FPS (higher is better)
Very high quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, HR Textures, DirectX11, Windows 10 x64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality DirectX12 Windows10 x64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Async Compute ,Windows 10x64
FPS (higher is better)
DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA
FPS (higher is better)