TITAN V vs GeForce GTX TITAN X (Pascal)
Summary
Reasons to consider TITAN V |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
| Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
| Supports PhysX |
| Supports G-Sync |
| Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute. |
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX TITAN X (Pascal) |
| Supports PhysX |
| Supports G-Sync |
| Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Pascal), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends TITAN V
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| TITAN V | | GeForce GTX TITAN X (Pascal) | |
|---|
| GPU Name | GV100 (GV100-400-A1) | vs | GP102 (GP102) |
| Fab Process | 12 nm | vs | 16 nm |
| Die Size | 815 mm² | vs | 471 mm² |
| Transistors | 21,100 million | vs | 12,000 million |
| Shaders | 5120 | vs | 3584 |
| Compute Units | 80 | vs | 28 |
| Core clock | 1200 MHz | vs | 1417 MHz |
| ROPs | 96 | vs | 96 |
| TMUs | 320 | vs | 224 |
Memory Configuration
| TITAN V | | GeForce GTX TITAN X (Pascal) | |
|---|
| Memory Type | HBM2 | vs | GDDR5X |
| Bus Width | 3072 bit | vs | 384 bit |
| Memory Speed | 850 MHz
1700 MHz effective | vs | 1251 MHz
10008 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 12288 Mb | vs | 12288 Mb |
Additional details
| TITAN V | | GeForce GTX TITAN X (Pascal) | |
|---|
| TDP | 250 watts | vs | 250 watts |
| Release Date | 7 Dec 2017 | vs | 2 Aug 2016 |
GigaPixels - higher is better
GigaTexels - higher is better
GFLOPs - higher is better