TITAN V vs Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano

TITAN V
Memory: 12288Mb HBM2DESKTOP
Release date: UNRELEASED
TITAN V
Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano
Memory: 8192Mb HBM2DESKTOP
Release date: 8 Aug 2017
Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano

Summary

Reasons to consider TITAN V

Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications.
Supports PhysX.
Supports G-Sync.
Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty).
Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute.

Reasons to consider Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano

Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute.
Supports FreeSync.
Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty).
Supports TrueAudio.

TITAN V

HWBench recommends TITAN V

Based on theoretical specifications.



Specifications

Core Configuration

TITAN VRadeon RX Vega 64 Nano
GPU NameGV100 (GV100)vsVega 10 (Vega 10 XT)
Fab Process12 nmvs14 nm
Die Size815 mm²vs484 mm²
Transistors21,100 millionvs12,500 million
Shaders5120vs4096
Compute Units80vs64
Core clock1455 MHzvs1156 MHz
ROPs128vs64
TMUs320vs256

Memory Configuration

TITAN VRadeon RX Vega 64 Nano
Memory TypeHBM2vsHBM2
Bus Width4096 bitvs2048 bit
Memory Speed850 MHz
1700 MHz effective
vs800 MHz
1600 MHz effective
Memory Size12288 Mbvs8192 Mb

Additional details

TITAN VRadeon RX Vega 64 Nano
TDP250 wattsvs250 watts
Release DateUNRELEASEDvs8 Aug 2017

Raw Performance comparison

Pixel Rate

  • TITAN V
    187.60 GP/s
  • Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano
    79.81 GP/s

GigaPixels - higher is better

Texel Rate

  • TITAN V
    384.00 GT/s
  • Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano
    319.20 GT/s

GigaTexels - higher is better

Memory bandwidth

  • TITAN V
    652.80 GB/s
  • Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano
    409.60 GB/s

GB/s - higher is better

Single precision performance

  • TITAN V
    15012.00 GFLOPs
  • Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano
    10215.00 GFLOPs

GFLOPs - higher is better