TITAN V vs Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano
Summary
Reasons to consider TITAN V |
| Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
| Supports PhysX |
| Supports G-Sync |
| Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute. |
Reasons to consider Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano |
| Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
| Supports FreeSync |
| Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Supports TrueAudio |
| Based on an outdated architecture (AMD GCN), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends TITAN V
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| TITAN V | | Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano | |
|---|
| GPU Name | GV100 (GV100-400-A1) | vs | Vega 10 (Vega 10 XT) |
| Fab Process | 12 nm | vs | 14 nm |
| Die Size | 815 mm² | vs | 484 mm² |
| Transistors | 21,100 million | vs | 12,500 million |
| Shaders | 5120 | vs | 4096 |
| Compute Units | 80 | vs | 64 |
| Core clock | 1200 MHz | vs | 1156 MHz |
| ROPs | 96 | vs | 64 |
| TMUs | 320 | vs | 256 |
Memory Configuration
| TITAN V | | Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano | |
|---|
| Memory Type | HBM2 | vs | HBM2 |
| Bus Width | 3072 bit | vs | 2048 bit |
| Memory Speed | 850 MHz
1700 MHz effective | vs | 800 MHz
1600 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 12288 Mb | vs | 8192 Mb |
Additional details
| TITAN V | | Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano | |
|---|
| TDP | 250 watts | vs | 250 watts |
| Release Date | 7 Dec 2017 | vs | 8 Aug 2017 |
TITAN V
139.70 GP/s
Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano
79.81 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
TITAN V
465.60 GT/s
Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano
319.20 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
TITAN V
652.80 GB/s
Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano
409.60 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
TITAN V
14899.00 GFLOPs
Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano
10215.00 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better