HWBench.com

    AMD E-300 vs Intel Core M-5Y10c

    AMD E-300
    AMD Socket FT1MOBILE
    1300 MHz / Cores: 2 / Aug 2011
    AMD E-300
    Intel Core M-5Y10c
    MOBILE
    800 MHz / Cores: 2 / Oct 2014
    Intel Core M-5Y10c

    Summary

    Synthetic performance index

    • AMD E-300
      100%
    • Intel Core M-5Y10c
      344%

    Relative performance

    Single thread performance index

    • AMD E-300
      100%
    • Intel Core M-5Y10c
      341%

    Relative performance

    Multi thread performance index

    • AMD E-300
      100%
    • Intel Core M-5Y10c
      347%

    Relative performance

    Reasons to consider AMD E-300

    None

    Reasons to consider Intel Core M-5Y10c

    Much higher single threaded performance (around 241% higher), makes a noticeable performance difference in gaming and the majority of applications.
    Much higher multi threaded performance (around 247% higher). This allows for higher performance in professional applications like encoding or heavy multitasking.
    This is a newer product, it might have better application compatibility/performance (check features chart below).
    Around 244% higher average synthetic performance.
    Intel Core M-5Y10c

    Gaming

    HWBench recommends Intel Core M-5Y10c

    Based on game and synthetic benchmarks, and theoretical specifications.
    Intel Core M-5Y10c

    Productivity

    HWBench recommends Intel Core M-5Y10c

    Based on productivity benchmarks, overall multithreaded performance and theoretical specifications.

    Specifications

    Features

    AMD E-300Intel Core M-5Y10c
    SSE
    SSE2
    SSE3
    SSSE3
    SSE4a
    NX bit
    AMD64
    AMD-V
    MMX
    SSE4.2
    AVX
    EIST
    Intel 64
    XD bit
    VT-x
    Hyper-Threading

    Architecture

    AMD E-300Intel Core M-5Y10c
    ArchitectureAMD BobcatvsIntel_Broadwell
    MarketMobilevsMobile
    Memory SupportunknownvsDDR4
    CodenameZacatevsBroadwell-Y
    Release DateAug 2011vsOct 2014

    Cores

    AMD E-300Intel Core M-5Y10c
    Cores2vs2
    Threads2vs4
    SMPs1vs1
    Integrated GraphicsRadeon HD 6310vsIntel HD 5300

    Cache

    AMD E-300Intel Core M-5Y10c
    L1 Cache64 KB (per core)vs64 KB (per core)
    L2 Cache512 KB (per core)vs256 KB (per core)
    L3 Cache0 KBvs4096 KB (shared)

    Physical

    AMD E-300Intel Core M-5Y10c
    SocketAMD Socket FT1vs
    Max Case Tempunknownvsunknown
    Packagevs
    Die Size75mm²vs50mm²
    Process40 nmvs14 nm

    Performance

    AMD E-300Intel Core M-5Y10c
    Cpu Frequency1300 MHzvs800 MHz
    Turbo Clocknonevs2000 MHz
    Base Clock100 MHzvs100 MHz
    Voltage1.35 Vvsunknown
    TDP18 Wvs5 W

    Raw performance index

    Raw single-thread performance estimation

    • AMD E-300
      1300 points
    • Intel Core M-5Y10c
      2240 points

    Points - higher is better

    Raw multi-thread performance estimation

    • AMD E-300
      2600 points
    • Intel Core M-5Y10c
      2150 points

    Points - higher is better

    Synthetic benchmarks

    Cinebench R10 32Bit Single

    • AMD E-300
      853
    • Intel Core M-5Y10c
      2726

    points - higher is better

    Cinebench R10 32Bit Multi

    • AMD E-300
      1176
    • Intel Core M-5Y10c
      3804

    points - higher is better

    Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

    • AMD E-300
      0.25
    • Intel Core M-5Y10c
      0.91

    points - higher is better

    Cinebench R11.5 64Bit

    • AMD E-300
      0.48
    • Intel Core M-5Y10c
      1.78

    points - higher is better

    Similar comparisons

    AMD E-300VS AMD A6-9220C SoC
    AMD E-300AMD A6-9220C SoC
    AMD E-300VS Intel Core M-5Y10
    AMD E-300Intel Core M-5Y10
    Intel Core M-5Y10cVS AMD A6-9220C SoC
    Intel Core M-5Y10cAMD A6-9220C SoC
    Intel Core M-5Y10cVS Intel Core M-5Y10
    Intel Core M-5Y10cIntel Core M-5Y10
    AMD A6-9500EVS Intel Core M-5Y31
    AMD A6-9500EIntel Core M-5Y31
    Intel Core M-5Y31VS Intel Core M-5Y51
    Intel Core M-5Y31Intel Core M-5Y51