AMD E1-2100 vs Intel Atom N2600
Summary
AMD E1-2100
100%
Intel Atom N2600
120%
Relative performance
AMD E1-2100
140%
Intel Atom N2600
100%
Relative performance
AMD E1-2100
100%
Intel Atom N2600
164%
Relative performance
Reasons to consider AMD E1-2100 |
| Much higher single threaded performance (around 40% higher), makes a noticeable performance difference in gaming and the majority of applications. |
| This is a newer product, it might have better application compatibility/performance (check features chart below). |
Reasons to consider Intel Atom N2600 |
| Much higher multi threaded performance (around 64% higher). This allows for higher performance in professional applications like encoding or heavy multitasking. |
| Around 20% higher average synthetic performance. |
Gaming
HWBench recommends Intel Atom N2600
Based on game and synthetic benchmarks, and theoretical specifications.
Productivity
HWBench recommends Intel Atom N2600
Based on productivity benchmarks, overall multithreaded performance and theoretical specifications.
Features
| AMD E1-2100 | | Intel Atom N2600 | |
|---|
| MMX | | | |
| 3DNow! | | | |
| SSE | | | |
| SSE2 | | | |
| SSE3 | | | |
| SSE4A | | | |
| SSE4.1 | | | |
| SSE4.2 | | | |
| AVX | | | |
| AES | | | |
| F16C | | | |
| BMI1 | | | |
| AMD64 | | | |
| CnQ | | | |
| NX bit | | | |
| AMD-V | | | |
| SSSE3 | | | |
| Intel 64 | | | |
| Hyper-Threading | | | |
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology (EIST) | | | |
| XD bit (an NX bit implementation) | | | |
Architecture
| AMD E1-2100 | | Intel Atom N2600 | |
|---|
| Architecture | AMD Jaguar | vs | Intel_Saltwell |
| Market | Mobile | vs | Mobile |
| Memory Support | DDR3 | vs | DDR3 |
| Codename | Kabini | vs | Cedarview |
| Release Date | May 2013 | vs | Dec 2011 |
Cores
| AMD E1-2100 | | Intel Atom N2600 | |
|---|
| Cores | 2 | vs | 2 |
| Threads | 2 | vs | 2 |
| SMPs | 1 | vs | 1 |
| Integrated Graphics | Radeon HD 8210 | vs | GMA |
Cache
| AMD E1-2100 | | Intel Atom N2600 | |
|---|
| L1 Cache | 128 KB (per core) | vs | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB (per core) | vs | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 Cache | 0 KB | vs | 0 KB |
Physical
| AMD E1-2100 | | Intel Atom N2600 | |
|---|
| Socket | AMD Socket FT3 | vs | Intel BGA 559 |
| Max Case Temp | 90°C | vs | unknown |
| Package | BGA2 | vs | uFCBGA8 |
| Die Size | 246mm² | vs | 66mm² |
| Process | 32 nm | vs | 32 nm |
Performance
| AMD E1-2100 | | Intel Atom N2600 | |
|---|
| Cpu Frequency | 1000 MHz | vs | 1600 MHz |
| Turbo Clock | none | vs | none |
| Base Clock | 100 MHz | vs | 133 MHz |
| Voltage | 1.475 V | vs | 1.175 V |
| TDP | 9 W | vs | 4 W |
AMD E1-2100
1000 points
Intel Atom N2600
320 points
Points - higher is better
AMD E1-2100
2000 points
Intel Atom N2600
640 points
Points - higher is better
AMD E1-2100
853
Intel Atom N2600
895
points - higher is better
AMD E1-2100
521
Intel Atom N2600
375
points - higher is better
AMD E1-2100
772
Intel Atom N2600
812
points - higher is better
AMD E1-2100
765
Intel Atom N2600
541
points - higher is better
AMD E1-2100
1435
Intel Atom N2600
1527.5
points - higher is better
AMD E1-2100
62.97
Intel Atom N2600
92
seconds - lower is better
AMD E1-2100
106.97
Intel Atom N2600
66
seconds - lower is better
AMD E1-2100
14.69
Intel Atom N2600
9.8
FPS - higher is better
AMD E1-2100
2.69
Intel Atom N2600
9.9
FPS - higher is better