HWBench.com

    AMD E2-3000 vs Intel Core M-5Y10c

    AMD E2-3000
    AMD Socket FT3MOBILE
    1650 MHz / Cores: 2 / May 2013
    AMD E2-3000
    Intel Core M-5Y10c
    MOBILE
    800 MHz / Cores: 2 / Oct 2014
    Intel Core M-5Y10c

    Summary

    Synthetic performance index

    • AMD E2-3000
      100%
    • Intel Core M-5Y10c
      265%

    Relative performance

    Single thread performance index

    • AMD E2-3000
      100%
    • Intel Core M-5Y10c
      210%

    Relative performance

    Multi thread performance index

    • AMD E2-3000
      100%
    • Intel Core M-5Y10c
      320%

    Relative performance

    Reasons to consider AMD E2-3000

    None

    Reasons to consider Intel Core M-5Y10c

    Much higher single threaded performance (around 110% higher), makes a noticeable performance difference in gaming and the majority of applications.
    Much higher multi threaded performance (around 220% higher). This allows for higher performance in professional applications like encoding or heavy multitasking.
    This is a newer product, it might have better application compatibility/performance (check features chart below).
    Around 165% higher average synthetic performance.
    Intel Core M-5Y10c

    Gaming

    HWBench recommends Intel Core M-5Y10c

    Based on game and synthetic benchmarks, and theoretical specifications.
    Intel Core M-5Y10c

    Productivity

    HWBench recommends Intel Core M-5Y10c

    Based on productivity benchmarks, overall multithreaded performance and theoretical specifications.

    Specifications

    Features

    AMD E2-3000Intel Core M-5Y10c
    MMX
    3DNow!
    SSE
    SSE2
    SSE3
    SSE4A
    SSE4.1
    SSE4.2
    AVX
    AES
    F16C
    BMI1
    AMD64
    CnQ
    NX bit
    AMD-V
    SSSE3
    EIST
    Intel 64
    XD bit
    VT-x
    Hyper-Threading

    Architecture

    AMD E2-3000Intel Core M-5Y10c
    ArchitectureAMD JaguarvsIntel_Broadwell
    MarketMobilevsMobile
    Memory SupportDDR3vsDDR4
    CodenameKabinivsBroadwell-Y
    Release DateMay 2013vsOct 2014

    Cores

    AMD E2-3000Intel Core M-5Y10c
    Cores2vs2
    Threads2vs4
    SMPs1vs1
    Integrated GraphicsRadeon HD 8280vsIntel HD 5300

    Cache

    AMD E2-3000Intel Core M-5Y10c
    L1 Cache128 KB (per core)vs64 KB (per core)
    L2 Cache512 KB (per core)vs256 KB (per core)
    L3 Cache0 KBvs4096 KB (shared)

    Physical

    AMD E2-3000Intel Core M-5Y10c
    SocketAMD Socket FT3vs
    Max Case Temp90°Cvsunknown
    PackageBGA2vs
    Die Size246mm²vs50mm²
    Process32 nmvs14 nm

    Performance

    AMD E2-3000Intel Core M-5Y10c
    Cpu Frequency1650 MHzvs800 MHz
    Turbo Clocknonevs2000 MHz
    Base Clock100 MHzvs100 MHz
    Voltage1.475 Vvsunknown
    TDP15 Wvs5 W

    Raw performance index

    Raw single-thread performance estimation

    • AMD E2-3000
      1650 points
    • Intel Core M-5Y10c
      2240 points

    Points - higher is better

    Raw multi-thread performance estimation

    • AMD E2-3000
      3300 points
    • Intel Core M-5Y10c
      2150 points

    Points - higher is better

    Synthetic benchmarks

    Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

    • AMD E2-3000 (simulated)
      31.35
    • Intel Core M-5Y10c
      66

    points - higher is better

    Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

    • AMD E2-3000 (simulated)
      51.15
    • Intel Core M-5Y10c
      164

    points - higher is better

    Similar comparisons

    AMD E2-3000VS AMD A6-9220C SoC
    AMD E2-3000AMD A6-9220C SoC
    AMD E2-3000VS Intel Core M-5Y10
    AMD E2-3000Intel Core M-5Y10
    Intel Core M-5Y10cVS AMD A6-9220C SoC
    Intel Core M-5Y10cAMD A6-9220C SoC
    Intel Core M-5Y10cVS Intel Core M-5Y10
    Intel Core M-5Y10cIntel Core M-5Y10
    AMD A6-9500EVS Intel Core M-5Y31
    AMD A6-9500EIntel Core M-5Y31
    Intel Core M-5Y31VS Intel Core M-5Y51
    Intel Core M-5Y31Intel Core M-5Y51