Intel Celeron B800 vs Intel Core i3-3120M
Summary
Intel Celeron B800
100%
Intel Core i3-3120M
176%
Relative performance
Intel Celeron B800
100%
Intel Core i3-3120M
162%
Relative performance
Intel Celeron B800
100%
Intel Core i3-3120M
186%
Relative performance
Reasons to consider Intel Celeron B800 |
None |
Reasons to consider Intel Core i3-3120M |
Much higher single threaded performance (around 62% higher), makes a noticeable performance difference in gaming and the majority of applications. |
Much higher multi threaded performance (around 86% higher). This allows for higher performance in professional applications like encoding or heavy multitasking. |
This is a newer product, it might have better application compatibility/performance (check features chart below). |
Around 76% higher average synthetic performance. |
Gaming
HWBench recommends Intel Core i3-3120M
Based on game and synthetic benchmarks, and theoretical specifications.
Productivity
HWBench recommends Intel Core i3-3120M
Based on productivity benchmarks, overall multithreaded performance and theoretical specifications.
Features
Intel Celeron B800 | | Intel Core i3-3120M | |
---|
MMX | | | |
SSE | | | |
SSE2 | | | |
SSE3 | | | |
SSSE3 | | | |
SSE4.1 | | | |
SSE4.2 | | | |
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology (EIST) | | | |
Intel 64 | | | |
XD bit (an NX bit implementation) | | | |
Intel VT-x | | | |
Smart Cache. | | | |
AVX | | | |
EIST | | | |
Hyper-Threading | | | |
XD bit | | | |
VT-x | | | |
Architecture
| Intel Celeron B800 | | Intel Core i3-3120M | |
---|
Architecture | Intel_SandyBridge | vs | Intel_IvyBridge |
Market | Mobile | vs | Mobile |
Memory Support | DDR3 | vs | DDR3 |
Codename | Sandy Bridge | vs | Ivy Bridge |
Release Date | Jun 2011 | vs | Sep 2012 |
Cores
| Intel Celeron B800 | | Intel Core i3-3120M | |
---|
Cores | 2 | vs | 2 |
Threads | 2 | vs | 4 |
SMPs | 1 | vs | 1 |
Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | vs | Intel HD 4000 |
Cache
| Intel Celeron B800 | | Intel Core i3-3120M | |
---|
L1 Cache | 64 KB (per core) | vs | 64 KB (per core) |
L2 Cache | 256 KB (per core) | vs | 256 KB (per core) |
L3 Cache | 2048 KB (shared) | vs | 3072 KB (shared) |
Physical
| Intel Celeron B800 | | Intel Core i3-3120M | |
---|
Socket | Intel Socket G2 (988B) | vs | Intel BGA1023 |
Max Case Temp | unknown | vs | unknown |
Package | rPGA | vs | FC-BGA12F |
Die Size | 131mm² | vs | 118mm² |
Process | 32 nm | vs | 22 nm |
Performance
| Intel Celeron B800 | | Intel Core i3-3120M | |
---|
Cpu Frequency | 1500 MHz | vs | 2500 MHz |
Turbo Clock | none | vs | none |
Base Clock | 100 MHz | vs | 100 MHz |
Voltage | unknown | vs | unknown |
TDP | 35 W | vs | 35 W |
Intel Celeron B800
1500 points
Intel Core i3-3120M
2575 points
Points - higher is better
Intel Celeron B800
3000 points
Intel Core i3-3120M
6180 points
Points - higher is better
Intel Celeron B800
1857
Intel Core i3-3120M
3955
points - higher is better
Intel Celeron B800
1111
Intel Core i3-3120M
1859
points - higher is better
Intel Celeron B800
1534
Intel Core i3-3120M
3057
points - higher is better
Intel Celeron B800
1910
Intel Core i3-3120M
3428
points - higher is better
Intel Celeron B800
3779
Intel Core i3-3120M
6867
points - higher is better
Intel Celeron B800
26.1
Intel Core i3-3120M
15.22
seconds - lower is better
Intel Celeron B800
47
Intel Core i3-3120M
22.02
seconds - lower is better