HWBench.com

    Intel Core M-5Y10 vs Intel Celeron G465

    Intel Core M-5Y10
    MOBILE
    800 MHz / Cores: 2 / Sep 2014
    Intel Core M-5Y10
    Intel Celeron G465
    Intel Socket 1155DESKTOP
    1900 MHz / Cores: 1 / Sep 2012
    Intel Celeron G465

    Summary

    Synthetic performance index

    • Intel Core M-5Y10
      179%
    • Intel Celeron G465
      100%

    Relative performance

    Single thread performance index

    • Intel Core M-5Y10
      129%
    • Intel Celeron G465
      100%

    Relative performance

    Multi thread performance index

    • Intel Core M-5Y10
      229%
    • Intel Celeron G465
      100%

    Relative performance

    Reasons to consider Intel Core M-5Y10

    Much higher single threaded performance (around 29% higher), makes a noticeable performance difference in gaming and the majority of applications.
    Much higher multi threaded performance (around 129% higher). This allows for higher performance in professional applications like encoding or heavy multitasking.
    This is a newer product, it might have better application compatibility/performance (check features chart below).
    Around 79% higher average synthetic performance.

    Reasons to consider Intel Celeron G465

    None
    Intel Core M-5Y10

    Gaming

    HWBench recommends Intel Core M-5Y10

    Based on game and synthetic benchmarks, and theoretical specifications.
    Intel Core M-5Y10

    Productivity

    HWBench recommends Intel Core M-5Y10

    Based on productivity benchmarks, overall multithreaded performance and theoretical specifications.

    Specifications

    Features

    Intel Core M-5Y10Intel Celeron G465
    MMX
    SSE
    SSE2
    SSE3
    SSSE3
    SSE4.2
    AVX
    EIST
    Intel 64
    XD bit
    VT-x
    Hyper-Threading
    SSE4.1
    Intel VT-x
    Smart Cache

    Architecture

    Intel Core M-5Y10Intel Celeron G465
    ArchitectureIntel_BroadwellvsIntel_SandyBridge
    MarketMobilevsDesktop
    Memory SupportDDR4vsDDR3
    CodenameBroadwell-YvsSandy Bridge
    Release DateSep 2014vsSep 2012

    Cores

    Intel Core M-5Y10Intel Celeron G465
    Cores2vs1
    Threads4vs1
    SMPs1vs1
    Integrated GraphicsIntel HD 5300vsIntel HD (Sandy Bridge)

    Cache

    Intel Core M-5Y10Intel Celeron G465
    L1 Cache64 KB (per core)vs64 KB
    L2 Cache256 KB (per core)vs256 KB
    L3 Cache4096 KB (shared)vs1536 KB

    Physical

    Intel Core M-5Y10Intel Celeron G465
    SocketvsIntel Socket 1155
    Max Case Tempunknownvsunknown
    PackagevsFC-LGA10
    Die Size50mm²vs131mm²
    Process14 nmvs32 nm

    Performance

    Intel Core M-5Y10Intel Celeron G465
    Cpu Frequency800 MHzvs1900 MHz
    Turbo Clock2000 MHzvsnone
    Base Clock100 MHzvs100 MHz
    Voltageunknownvsunknown
    TDP5 Wvs35 W

    Raw performance index

    Raw single-thread performance estimation

    • Intel Core M-5Y10
      2240 points
    • Intel Celeron G465
      1900 points

    Points - higher is better

    Raw multi-thread performance estimation

    • Intel Core M-5Y10
      2150 points
    • Intel Celeron G465
      1900 points

    Points - higher is better

    Synthetic benchmarks

    Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

    • Intel Core M-5Y10
      81
    • Intel Celeron G465 (simulated)
      62.65

    points - higher is better

    Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

    • Intel Core M-5Y10
      155
    • Intel Celeron G465 (simulated)
      67.65

    points - higher is better

    Similar comparisons

    Intel Core M-5Y10VS AMD A6-9220C SoC
    Intel Core M-5Y10AMD A6-9220C SoC
    Intel Core M-5Y10VS Intel Core M-5Y10c
    Intel Core M-5Y10Intel Core M-5Y10c
    Intel Celeron G465VS AMD A6-9220C SoC
    Intel Celeron G465AMD A6-9220C SoC
    Intel Celeron G465VS Intel Core M-5Y10c
    Intel Celeron G465Intel Core M-5Y10c
    AMD A6-9500EVS Intel Core M-5Y31
    AMD A6-9500EIntel Core M-5Y31
    Intel Core M-5Y31VS Intel Core M-5Y51
    Intel Core M-5Y31Intel Core M-5Y51