Intel Ryzen Threadripper 3980X vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
Summary
Reasons to consider Intel Ryzen Threadripper 3980X |
| 9% higher single threaded performance. |
Reasons to consider AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X |
| 10% higher multi threaded performance. |
Gaming
No clear winner declared
Productivity
No clear winner declared
Features
| Intel Ryzen Threadripper 3980X | | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X | |
|---|
| MMX | | | |
| SSE | | | |
| SSE2 | | | |
| SSE3 | | | |
| SSSE3 | | | |
| SSE4A | | | |
| SSE4.1 | | | |
| SSE4.2 | | | |
| AES | | | |
| AVX | | | |
| AVX2 | | | |
| BMI1 | | | |
| BMI2 | | | |
| SHA | | | |
| F16C | | | |
| FMA3 | | | |
| AMD64 | | | |
| EVP | | | |
| AMD-V | | | |
| SMAP | | | |
| SMEP | | | |
| SMT | | | |
| Precision Boost 2 | | | |
| XFR 2 | | | |
Architecture
| Intel Ryzen Threadripper 3980X | | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X | |
|---|
| Architecture | AMD Zen 2 | vs | AMD Zen 2 |
| Market | Desktop | vs | Desktop |
| Memory Support | DDR4-3200 MHz
Quad-channel | vs | DDR4-3200 MHz
Quad-channel |
| Codename | Matisse | vs | Matisse |
| Release Date | Nov 2019 | vs | Feb 2020 |
Cores
| Intel Ryzen Threadripper 3980X | | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X | |
|---|
| Cores | 48 | vs | 64 |
| Threads | 96 | vs | 128 |
| SMPs | 1 | vs | 1 |
| Integrated Graphics | No | vs | No |
Cache
| Intel Ryzen Threadripper 3980X | | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X | |
|---|
| L1 Cache | 96K (per core) | vs | 96K (per core) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | vs | 512K (per core) |
| L3 Cache | 128MB | vs | 128MB |
Physical
| Intel Ryzen Threadripper 3980X | | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X | |
|---|
| Socket | socket test | vs | AMD Socket TR4 |
| Max Case Temp | N/A | vs | 95°C |
| Package | sTRX4 | vs | sTRX4 |
| Die Size | 74mm² | vs | 74mm² |
| Process | 7 nm | vs | 7 nm |
Performance
| Intel Ryzen Threadripper 3980X | | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X | |
|---|
| Cpu Frequency | 3500 MHz | vs | 2900 MHz |
| Turbo Clock | 4700 MHz | vs | 4300 MHz |
| Base Clock | 100 MHz | vs | 100 MHz |
| Voltage | N/A | vs | N/A |
| TDP | 280 W | vs | 280 W |
Points - higher is better
Points - higher is better
points - higher is better
points - higher is better