Intel Xeon E3-1270 vs Intel Core i7-3770
Summary
Reasons to consider Intel Xeon E3-1270 |
None |
Reasons to consider Intel Core i7-3770 |
Has an integrated GPU, which allows to run the system without a dedicated graphics card, unlike the Intel Xeon E3-1270. |
Higher theoretical single-threaded performance, based on raw specifications plus core architecture. |
Gaming
No clear winner declared
Productivity
No clear winner declared
Features
Intel Xeon E3-1270 | | Intel Core i7-3770 | |
---|
MMX | | | |
SSE | | | |
SSE2 | | | |
SSE3 | | | |
SSSE3 | | | |
SSE4.2 | | | |
AVX | | | |
EIST | | | |
Intel 64 | | | |
XD bit | | | |
TXT | | | |
VT-x | | | |
VT-d | | | |
Hyper-Threading | | | |
AES-NI | | | |
Architecture
| Intel Xeon E3-1270 | | Intel Core i7-3770 | |
---|
Architecture | Intel_SandyBridge | vs | Intel_IvyBridge |
Market | Server | vs | Desktop |
Memory Support | DDR3 | vs | DDR3 |
Codename | Sandy Bridge | vs | Ivy Bridge |
Release Date | Apr 2011 | vs | Apr 2012 |
Cores
| Intel Xeon E3-1270 | | Intel Core i7-3770 | |
---|
Cores | 4 | vs | 4 |
Threads | 8 | vs | 8 |
SMPs | 1 | vs | 1 |
Integrated Graphics | No | vs | Intel HD 4000 |
Cache
| Intel Xeon E3-1270 | | Intel Core i7-3770 | |
---|
L1 Cache | 64 KB (per core) | vs | 64 KB (per core) |
L2 Cache | 256 KB (per core) | vs | 256 KB (per core) |
L3 Cache | 8192 KB (shared) | vs | 8192 KB (shared) |
Physical
| Intel Xeon E3-1270 | | Intel Core i7-3770 | |
---|
Socket | Intel Socket 1155 | vs | Intel Socket 1155 |
Max Case Temp | unknown | vs | 67°C |
Package | FC-LGA10 | vs | FC-LGA12C |
Die Size | 216mm² | vs | 160mm² |
Process | 32 nm | vs | 22 nm |
Performance
| Intel Xeon E3-1270 | | Intel Core i7-3770 | |
---|
Cpu Frequency | 3400 MHz | vs | 3400 MHz |
Turbo Clock | 3800 MHz | vs | 3900 MHz |
Base Clock | 100 MHz | vs | 100 MHz |
Voltage | unknown | vs | unknown |
TDP | 80 W | vs | 77 W |
Intel Xeon E3-1270
3800 points
Intel Core i7-3770
4017 points
Points - higher is better
Intel Xeon E3-1270
16320 points
Intel Core i7-3770
16809 points
Points - higher is better