GeForce 210 OEM vs GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition
Summary
Reasons to consider GeForce 210 OEM |
188 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition . |
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor |
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition |
Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor |
HWBench recommends GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| GeForce 210 OEM | | GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition | |
---|
GPU Name | GT216 () | vs | GT200B (G200-105-B3) |
Fab Process | 40 nm | vs | 55 nm |
Die Size | 100 mm² | vs | 470 mm² |
Transistors | 486 million | vs | 1,400 million |
Shaders | 16 | vs | 240 |
Compute Units | 2 | vs | 10 |
Core clock | 475 MHz | vs | 633 MHz |
ROPs | 4 | vs | 28 |
TMUs | 8 | vs | 80 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce 210 OEM | | GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition | |
---|
Memory Type | DDR2 | vs | GDDR3 |
Bus Width | 64 bit | vs | 448 bit |
Memory Speed | 400 MHz
800 MHz effective | vs | 1134 MHz
2268 MHz effective |
Memory Size | 1024 Mb | vs | 896 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce 210 OEM | | GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition | |
---|
TDP | 31 watts | vs | 219 watts |
Release Date | 4 Sep 2009 | vs | 16 Feb 2010 |
GigaPixels - higher is better
GigaTexels - higher is better
GFLOPs - higher is better