GeForce 310 OEM vs GeForce GT 620
Summary
Reasons to consider GeForce 310 OEM |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
| PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor |
Reasons to consider GeForce GT 620 |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
| Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
| Supports PhysX |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Fermi), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends GeForce GT 620
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| GeForce 310 OEM | | GeForce GT 620 | |
|---|
| GPU Name | GT218 (GT218-300-A2) | vs | GF108 (GF108-100-KB-A1) |
| Fab Process | 40 nm | vs | 40 nm |
| Die Size | 57 mm² | vs | 116 mm² |
| Transistors | 260 million | vs | 585 million |
| Shaders | 16 | vs | 96 |
| Compute Units | 2 | vs | 2 |
| Core clock | 589 MHz | vs | 700 MHz |
| ROPs | 4 | vs | 4 |
| TMUs | 8 | vs | 16 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce 310 OEM | | GeForce GT 620 | |
|---|
| Memory Type | DDR2 | vs | DDR3 |
| Bus Width | 64 bit | vs | 64 bit |
| Memory Speed | 333 MHz
666 MHz effective | vs | 900 MHz
1800 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 512 Mb | vs | 1024 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce 310 OEM | | GeForce GT 620 | |
|---|
| TDP | 31 watts | vs | 49 watts |
| Release Date | 27 Nov 2009 | vs | 15 May 2012 |
GeForce 310 OEM
2.36 GP/s
GeForce GT 620
2.80 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
GeForce 310 OEM
4.71 GT/s
GeForce GT 620
11.20 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
GeForce 310 OEM
5.33 GB/s
GeForce GT 620
14.40 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
GeForce 310 OEM
44.86 GFLOPs
GeForce GT 620
268.80 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better