GeForce 510 OEM vs GeForce 605 OEM
Summary
Reasons to consider GeForce 510 OEM |
| Supports PhysX |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Fermi), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider GeForce 605 OEM |
| Supports PhysX |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Fermi), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
No clear winner declared
We have no data to declare a winner at this time.
Core Configuration
| GeForce 510 OEM | | GeForce 605 OEM | |
|---|
| GPU Name | GF119 () | vs | GF119 (GF119-200-A1) |
| Fab Process | 40 nm | vs | 40 nm |
| Die Size | 79 mm² | vs | 79 mm² |
| Transistors | 292 million | vs | 292 million |
| Shaders | 48 | vs | 48 |
| Compute Units | 1 | vs | 1 |
| Core clock | 523 MHz | vs | 523 MHz |
| ROPs | 4 | vs | 4 |
| TMUs | 8 | vs | 8 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce 510 OEM | | GeForce 605 OEM | |
|---|
| Memory Type | DDR3 | vs | DDR3 |
| Bus Width | 64 bit | vs | 64 bit |
| Memory Speed | 898 MHz
1796 MHz effective | vs | 897 MHz
1794 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 1024 Mb | vs | 512 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce 510 OEM | | GeForce 605 OEM | |
|---|
| TDP | 25 watts | vs | 25 watts |
| Release Date | 29 Sep 2011 | vs | 2 Apr 2012 |
GeForce 510 OEM
1.05 GP/s
GeForce 605 OEM
1.05 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
GeForce 510 OEM
4.18 GT/s
GeForce 605 OEM
4.18 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
GeForce 510 OEM
14.40 GB/s
GeForce 605 OEM
14.40 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
GeForce 510 OEM
100.40 GFLOPs
GeForce 605 OEM
100.40 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better