GeForce 615 vs GeForce 920A
Summary
Reasons to consider GeForce 615 |
| Supports PhysX |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Fermi), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider GeForce 920A |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
| Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
| Supports PhysX |
| Supports G-Sync |
| Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Kepler), there are less performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends GeForce 920A
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| GeForce 615 | | GeForce 920A | |
|---|
| GPU Name | GF108 () | vs | GK208 (N16V-GM) |
| Fab Process | 40 nm | vs | 28 nm |
| Die Size | 116 mm² | vs | 87 mm² |
| Transistors | 585 million | vs | unknown |
| Shaders | 48 | vs | 384 |
| Compute Units | 1 | vs | 2 |
| Core clock | 660 MHz | vs | 575 MHz |
| ROPs | 4 | vs | 8 |
| TMUs | 8 | vs | 16 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce 615 | | GeForce 920A | |
|---|
| Memory Type | DDR3 | vs | DDR3 |
| Bus Width | 128 bit | vs | 64 bit |
| Memory Speed | 900 MHz
1800 MHz effective | vs | 900 MHz
1800 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 1024 Mb | vs | 2048 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce 615 | | GeForce 920A | |
|---|
| TDP | 49 watts | vs | 33 watts |
| Release Date | 15 May 2012 | vs | 13 Mar 2015 |
GeForce 615
1.32 GP/s
GeForce 920A
4.60 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
GeForce 615
5.28 GT/s
GeForce 920A
9.20 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
GeForce 615
28.80 GB/s
GeForce 920A
14.40 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
GeForce 615
126.72 GFLOPs
GeForce 920A
441.60 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better