GeForce 820A vs Radeon HD 6610M
Summary
Reasons to consider GeForce 820A |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
| Supports PhysX |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Fermi), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider Radeon HD 6610M |
| Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
| Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends Radeon HD 6610M
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| GeForce 820A | | Radeon HD 6610M | |
|---|
| GPU Name | GF117 (N15V-GM) | vs | Whistler (Whistler LP) |
| Fab Process | 28 nm | vs | 40 nm |
| Die Size | 116 mm² | vs | 104 mm² |
| Transistors | 585 million | vs | 716 million |
| Shaders | 96 | vs | 480 |
| Compute Units | 2 | vs | 6 |
| Core clock | 775 MHz | vs | 450 MHz |
| ROPs | 8 | vs | 8 |
| TMUs | 16 | vs | 24 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce 820A | | Radeon HD 6610M | |
|---|
| Memory Type | DDR3 | vs | DDR3 |
| Bus Width | 64 bit | vs | 128 bit |
| Memory Speed | 900 MHz
1800 MHz effective | vs | 800 MHz
1600 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 1024 Mb | vs | 1024 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce 820A | | Radeon HD 6610M | |
|---|
| TDP | 15 watts | vs | 26 watts |
| Release Date | 17 Mar 2014 | vs | 4 Jan 2011 |
GeForce 820A
3.10 GP/s
Radeon HD 6610M
3.60 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
GeForce 820A
12.40 GT/s
Radeon HD 6610M
10.80 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
GeForce 820A
14.40 GB/s
Radeon HD 6610M
25.60 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
GeForce 820A
297.60 GFLOPs
Radeon HD 6610M
432.00 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better