GeForce 820M vs Radeon HD 6430M
Summary
Reasons to consider GeForce 820M |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
| Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
| Supports PhysX |
| Supports G-Sync |
| Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Kepler), there are less performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider Radeon HD 6430M |
| Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends GeForce 820M
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| GeForce 820M | | Radeon HD 6430M | |
|---|
| GPU Name | GK107 () | vs | Seymour (Seymour LE) |
| Fab Process | 28 nm | vs | 40 nm |
| Die Size | 118 mm² | vs | 67 mm² |
| Transistors | 1,270 million | vs | 370 million |
| Shaders | 384 | vs | 160 |
| Compute Units | 2 | vs | 2 |
| Core clock | 810 MHz | vs | 480 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | vs | 4 |
| TMUs | 32 | vs | 8 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce 820M | | Radeon HD 6430M | |
|---|
| Memory Type | DDR3 | vs | DDR3 |
| Bus Width | 128 bit | vs | 64 bit |
| Memory Speed | 901 MHz
1802 MHz effective | vs | 800 MHz
1600 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 2048 Mb | vs | 1024 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce 820M | | Radeon HD 6430M | |
|---|
| TDP | 45 watts | vs | 0 watts |
| Release Date | 21 Mar 2015 | vs | 4 Jan 2011 |
GeForce 820M
6.48 GP/s
Radeon HD 6430M
1.92 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
GeForce 820M
25.92 GT/s
Radeon HD 6430M
3.84 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
GeForce 820M
28.83 GB/s
Radeon HD 6430M
12.80 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
GeForce 820M
622.10 GFLOPs
Radeon HD 6430M
153.60 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better