GeForce 920A vs GeForce 920MX
Summary
GeForce 920A
100%
GeForce 920MX
100%
Relative performance
Reasons to consider GeForce 920A |
Supports PhysX |
Supports G-Sync |
Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Kepler), there are less performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider GeForce 920MX |
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
Supports PhysX |
Supports G-Sync |
Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Maxwell), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
No clear winner declared
These graphics cards seems to have comparable performance based on the synthetic benchmarks used (1 combinations of games and resolutions).
Core Configuration
| GeForce 920A | | GeForce 920MX | |
---|
GPU Name | GK208 (N16V-GM) | vs | GM108 (N16V-GMR1-S) |
Fab Process | 28 nm | vs | 28 nm |
Die Size | 87 mm² | vs | 0 mm² |
Transistors | unknown | vs | unknown |
Shaders | 384 | vs | 384 |
Compute Units | 2 | vs | 3 |
Core clock | 575 MHz | vs | 1072 MHz |
ROPs | 8 | vs | 8 |
TMUs | 16 | vs | 24 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce 920A | | GeForce 920MX | |
---|
Memory Type | DDR3 | vs | DDR3 |
Bus Width | 64 bit | vs | 64 bit |
Memory Speed | 900 MHz
1800 MHz effective | vs | 900 MHz
1800 MHz effective |
Memory Size | 2048 Mb | vs | 2048 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce 920A | | GeForce 920MX | |
---|
TDP | 33 watts | vs | 16 watts |
Release Date | 13 Mar 2015 | vs | 1 Mar 2016 |
GeForce 920A
4.60 GP/s
GeForce 920MX
8.58 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
GeForce 920A
9.20 GT/s
GeForce 920MX
25.73 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
GeForce 920A
14.40 GB/s
GeForce 920MX
14.40 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
GeForce 920A
441.60 GFLOPs
GeForce 920MX
823.30 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better
GeForce 920A
1730
GeForce 920MX
1730
Points (higher is better)