GeForce 920MX vs Radeon HD 6770M Mac Edition
Summary
Reasons to consider GeForce 920MX |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
| Around 16% higher average synthetic performance. |
| Supports PhysX |
| Supports G-Sync |
| Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Maxwell), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider Radeon HD 6770M Mac Edition |
| Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends GeForce 920MX
The GeForce 920MX is the better performing card based on the synthetic benchmarks used (1 benchmarks).
Core Configuration
| GeForce 920MX | | Radeon HD 6770M Mac Edition | |
|---|
| GPU Name | GM108 (N16V-GMR1-S) | vs | Whistler (Whistler XT) |
| Fab Process | 28 nm | vs | 40 nm |
| Die Size | 0 mm² | vs | 104 mm² |
| Transistors | unknown | vs | 716 million |
| Shaders | 384 | vs | 480 |
| Compute Units | 3 | vs | 6 |
| Core clock | 1072 MHz | vs | 725 MHz |
| ROPs | 8 | vs | 8 |
| TMUs | 24 | vs | 24 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce 920MX | | Radeon HD 6770M Mac Edition | |
|---|
| Memory Type | DDR3 | vs | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64 bit | vs | 128 bit |
| Memory Speed | 900 MHz
1800 MHz effective | vs | 900 MHz
3600 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 2048 Mb | vs | 512 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce 920MX | | Radeon HD 6770M Mac Edition | |
|---|
| TDP | 16 watts | vs | 35 watts |
| Release Date | 1 Mar 2016 | vs | 28 Jan 2011 |
GigaPixels - higher is better
GigaTexels - higher is better
GFLOPs - higher is better
Points (higher is better)