GeForce 920MX vs Radeon R5 M230
Summary
GeForce 920MX
100%
Radeon R5 M230
102%
Relative performance
Reasons to consider GeForce 920MX |
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
Supports PhysX |
Supports G-Sync |
Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Maxwell), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider Radeon R5 M230 |
Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
Supports Mantle |
Based on an outdated architecture (AMD GCN), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
No clear winner declared
We have no data to declare a winner at this time.
Core Configuration
| GeForce 920MX | | Radeon R5 M230 | |
---|
GPU Name | GM108 (N16V-GMR1-S) | vs | Jet (Jet PRO) |
Fab Process | 28 nm | vs | 28 nm |
Die Size | 0 mm² | vs | 77 mm² |
Transistors | unknown | vs | 1,040 million |
Shaders | 384 | vs | 320 |
Compute Units | 3 | vs | 5 |
Core clock | 1072 MHz | vs | 780 MHz |
ROPs | 8 | vs | 8 |
TMUs | 24 | vs | 20 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce 920MX | | Radeon R5 M230 | |
---|
Memory Type | DDR3 | vs | DDR3 |
Bus Width | 64 bit | vs | 64 bit |
Memory Speed | 900 MHz
1800 MHz effective | vs | 1000 MHz
2000 MHz effective |
Memory Size | 2048 Mb | vs | 4096 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce 920MX | | Radeon R5 M230 | |
---|
TDP | 16 watts | vs | 0 watts |
Release Date | 1 Mar 2016 | vs | 7 Jan 2014 |
GeForce 920MX
8.58 GP/s
Radeon R5 M230
6.84 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
GeForce 920MX
25.73 GT/s
Radeon R5 M230
17.10 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
GeForce 920MX
14.40 GB/s
Radeon R5 M230
16.00 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
GeForce 920MX
823.30 GFLOPs
Radeon R5 M230
547.20 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better
GeForce 920MX
1730
Radeon R5 M230
1770
Points (higher is better)