GeForce 9400 GT vs Radeon HD 6510
Summary
Reasons to consider GeForce 9400 GT |
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor |
Reasons to consider Radeon HD 6510 |
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends Radeon HD 6510
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| GeForce 9400 GT | | Radeon HD 6510 | |
---|
GPU Name | G86 () | vs | Redwood (Redwood PRO) |
Fab Process | 80 nm | vs | 40 nm |
Die Size | 127 mm² | vs | 104 mm² |
Transistors | 210 million | vs | 627 million |
Shaders | 16 | vs | 400 |
Compute Units | 2 | vs | 5 |
Core clock | 459 MHz | vs | 650 MHz |
ROPs | 4 | vs | 8 |
TMUs | 8 | vs | 20 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce 9400 GT | | Radeon HD 6510 | |
---|
Memory Type | DDR2 | vs | GDDR3 |
Bus Width | 64 bit | vs | 128 bit |
Memory Speed | 600 MHz
1200 MHz effective | vs | 500 MHz
1000 MHz effective |
Memory Size | 128 Mb | vs | 1024 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce 9400 GT | | Radeon HD 6510 | |
---|
TDP | 50 watts | vs | 39 watts |
Release Date | 1 Aug 2008 | vs | 14 May 2011 |
GeForce 9400 GT
1.84 GP/s
Radeon HD 6510
5.20 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
GeForce 9400 GT
3.67 GT/s
Radeon HD 6510
13.00 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
GeForce 9400 GT
9.60 GB/s
Radeon HD 6510
16.00 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
GeForce 9400 GT
29.38 GFLOPs
Radeon HD 6510
520.00 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better