GeForce 9500 GT vs Radeon HD 6230
Summary
Reasons to consider GeForce 9500 GT |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
| PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor |
Reasons to consider Radeon HD 6230 |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
| Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
No clear winner declared
We have no data to declare a winner at this time.
Core Configuration
| GeForce 9500 GT | | Radeon HD 6230 | |
|---|
| GPU Name | G96C () | vs | Cedar (Cedar LE) |
| Fab Process | 55 nm | vs | 40 nm |
| Die Size | 121 mm² | vs | 59 mm² |
| Transistors | 314 million | vs | 292 million |
| Shaders | 32 | vs | 80 |
| Compute Units | 2 | vs | 2 |
| Core clock | 550 MHz | vs | 650 MHz |
| ROPs | 8 | vs | 2 |
| TMUs | 16 | vs | 8 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce 9500 GT | | Radeon HD 6230 | |
|---|
| Memory Type | GDDR3 | vs | DDR2 |
| Bus Width | 128 bit | vs | 64 bit |
| Memory Speed | 800 MHz
1600 MHz effective | vs | 500 MHz
1000 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 512 Mb | vs | 512 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce 9500 GT | | Radeon HD 6230 | |
|---|
| TDP | 50 watts | vs | 19 watts |
| Release Date | 29 Jul 2008 | vs | 2 Jul 2011 |
GeForce 9500 GT
4.40 GP/s
Radeon HD 6230
1.30 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
GeForce 9500 GT
8.80 GT/s
Radeon HD 6230
5.20 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
GeForce 9500 GT
25.60 GB/s
Radeon HD 6230
8.00 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
GeForce 9500 GT
89.60 GFLOPs
Radeon HD 6230
104.00 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better