GeForce 9800 GTX vs GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
Summary
Reasons to consider GeForce 9800 GTX |
| 42 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 . |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
| PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor |
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
| PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor |
No clear winner declared
We have no data to declare a winner at this time.
Core Configuration
| GeForce 9800 GTX | | GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 | |
|---|
| GPU Name | G92 (G92-420-A2) | vs | GT200B (G200-103-B3) |
| Fab Process | 65 nm | vs | 55 nm |
| Die Size | 324 mm² | vs | 470 mm² |
| Transistors | 754 million | vs | 1,400 million |
| Shaders | 128 | vs | 192 |
| Compute Units | 8 | vs | 8 |
| Core clock | 675 MHz | vs | 576 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | vs | 28 |
| TMUs | 64 | vs | 64 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce 9800 GTX | | GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 | |
|---|
| Memory Type | GDDR3 | vs | GDDR3 |
| Bus Width | 256 bit | vs | 448 bit |
| Memory Speed | 1100 MHz
2200 MHz effective | vs | 999 MHz
1998 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 512 Mb | vs | 896 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce 9800 GTX | | GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 | |
|---|
| TDP | 140 watts | vs | 182 watts |
| Release Date | 28 Mar 2008 | vs | 23 Jul 2008 |
GeForce 9800 GTX
10.80 GP/s
GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
16.10 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
GeForce 9800 GTX
43.20 GT/s
GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
36.90 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
GeForce 9800 GTX
70.40 GB/s
GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
112.00 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
GeForce 9800 GTX
432.10 GFLOPs
GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
476.90 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better