GeForce G100 OEM vs GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand
Summary
Reasons to consider GeForce G100 OEM |
| 40 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand . |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
| PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor |
Reasons to consider GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
| Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
| Supports PhysX |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Fermi), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| GeForce G100 OEM | | GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand | |
|---|
| GPU Name | G98 (G98-700-U2) | vs | GF116 (GF116-150-A1) |
| Fab Process | 65 nm | vs | 40 nm |
| Die Size | 86 mm² | vs | 238 mm² |
| Transistors | 210 million | vs | 1,170 million |
| Shaders | 8 | vs | 144 |
| Compute Units | 1 | vs | 3 |
| Core clock | 540 MHz | vs | 720 MHz |
| ROPs | 4 | vs | 24 |
| TMUs | 8 | vs | 24 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce G100 OEM | | GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand | |
|---|
| Memory Type | DDR2 | vs | DDR3 |
| Bus Width | 64 bit | vs | 192 bit |
| Memory Speed | 400 MHz
800 MHz effective | vs | 800 MHz
1600 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 256 Mb | vs | 1536 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce G100 OEM | | GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand | |
|---|
| TDP | 35 watts | vs | 75 watts |
| Release Date | 10 Mar 2009 | vs | 24 Apr 2012 |
GigaPixels - higher is better
GigaTexels - higher is better
GFLOPs - higher is better