GeForce G210 OEM vs Radeon HD 6350
Summary
Reasons to consider GeForce G210 OEM |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
| PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor |
Reasons to consider Radeon HD 6350 |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
| Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
| Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends Radeon HD 6350
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| GeForce G210 OEM | | Radeon HD 6350 | |
|---|
| GPU Name | G96C () | vs | Cedar (Cedar PRO) |
| Fab Process | 55 nm | vs | 40 nm |
| Die Size | 121 mm² | vs | 59 mm² |
| Transistors | 314 million | vs | 292 million |
| Shaders | 16 | vs | 80 |
| Compute Units | 2 | vs | 2 |
| Core clock | 550 MHz | vs | 650 MHz |
| ROPs | 4 | vs | 4 |
| TMUs | 8 | vs | 8 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce G210 OEM | | Radeon HD 6350 | |
|---|
| Memory Type | DDR2 | vs | GDDR3 |
| Bus Width | 64 bit | vs | 64 bit |
| Memory Speed | 504 MHz
1008 MHz effective | vs | 400 MHz
800 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 512 Mb | vs | 512 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce G210 OEM | | Radeon HD 6350 | |
|---|
| TDP | 31 watts | vs | 19 watts |
| Release Date | 26 May 2009 | vs | 7 Feb 2011 |
GeForce G210 OEM
2.20 GP/s
Radeon HD 6350
2.60 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
GeForce G210 OEM
4.40 GT/s
Radeon HD 6350
5.20 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
GeForce G210 OEM
8.06 GB/s
Radeon HD 6350
6.40 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
GeForce G210 OEM
43.20 GFLOPs
Radeon HD 6350
104.00 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better