GeForce GT 1030 vs HD Graphics 4600 (Haswell GT2)

GeForce GT 1030
Memory: 2048Mb GDDR5DESKTOP
Release date: 17 May 2017
GeForce GT 1030
HD Graphics 4600 (Haswell GT2)
Memory: 0Mb System SharedDESKTOP
Release date: 3 Jun 2013
HD Graphics 4600 (Haswell GT2)

Summary

Reasons to consider GeForce GT 1030

This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support.
Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications.
Supports PhysX
Supports G-Sync
Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty)
Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Pascal), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications

Reasons to consider HD Graphics 4600 (Haswell GT2)


GeForce GT 1030

HWBench recommends GeForce GT 1030

Based on theoretical specifications.


Specifications

Core Configuration

GeForce GT 1030HD Graphics 4600 (Haswell GT2)
GPU NameGP108 (GP108-300-A1)vsHaswell GT2 ()
Fab Process14 nmvs22 nm
Die Size74 mm²vs177 mm²
Transistors1,800 millionvs392 million
Shaders384vs20
Compute Units3vs0
Core clock1228 MHzvs400 MHz
ROPs16vs2
TMUs24vs4

Memory Configuration

GeForce GT 1030HD Graphics 4600 (Haswell GT2)
Memory TypeGDDR5vsSystem Shared
Bus Width64 bitvsSystem Shared
Memory Speed1502 MHz
6008 MHz effective
vsSystem Shared
Memory Size2048 Mbvs0 Mb

Additional details

GeForce GT 1030HD Graphics 4600 (Haswell GT2)
TDP30 wattsvs45 watts
Release Date17 May 2017vs3 Jun 2013

Raw Performance comparison

Pixel Rate

  • GeForce GT 1030
    23.49 GP/s
  • HD Graphics 4600 (Haswell GT2)
    5.40 GP/s

GigaPixels - higher is better

Texel Rate

  • GeForce GT 1030
    35.23 GT/s
  • HD Graphics 4600 (Haswell GT2)
    10.80 GT/s

GigaTexels - higher is better

Memory bandwidth

  • GeForce GT 1030
    48.06 GB/s
  • HD Graphics 4600 (Haswell GT2)
    0.00 GB/s

GB/s - higher is better

Single precision performance

  • GeForce GT 1030
    1127.00 GFLOPs
  • HD Graphics 4600 (Haswell GT2)
    432.00 GFLOPs

GFLOPs - higher is better