GeForce GT 120 Mac Edition vs GeForce GTX 680
Summary
Reasons to consider GeForce GT 120 Mac Edition |
| 145 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce GTX 680 . |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
| PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor |
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 680 |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
| Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
| Supports PhysX |
| Supports G-Sync |
| Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Kepler), there are less performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends GeForce GTX 680
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| GeForce GT 120 Mac Edition | | GeForce GTX 680 | |
|---|
| GPU Name | G96C () | vs | GK104 (GK104-400-A2) |
| Fab Process | 55 nm | vs | 28 nm |
| Die Size | 121 mm² | vs | 294 mm² |
| Transistors | 314 million | vs | 3,540 million |
| Shaders | 32 | vs | 1536 |
| Compute Units | 2 | vs | 8 |
| Core clock | 550 MHz | vs | 1006 MHz |
| ROPs | 8 | vs | 32 |
| TMUs | 16 | vs | 128 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce GT 120 Mac Edition | | GeForce GTX 680 | |
|---|
| Memory Type | GDDR3 | vs | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128 bit | vs | 256 bit |
| Memory Speed | 800 MHz
1600 MHz effective | vs | 1502 MHz
6008 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 512 Mb | vs | 2048 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce GT 120 Mac Edition | | GeForce GTX 680 | |
|---|
| TDP | 50 watts | vs | 195 watts |
| Release Date | 20 Jan 2009 | vs | 22 Mar 2012 |
GigaPixels - higher is better
GigaTexels - higher is better
GFLOPs - higher is better