GeForce GT 120 Mac Edition vs GeForce GTX TITAN X
Summary
Reasons to consider GeForce GT 120 Mac Edition |
| 200 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce GTX TITAN X . |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
| PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor |
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX TITAN X |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
| Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
| Supports PhysX |
| Supports G-Sync |
| Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Maxwell), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends GeForce GTX TITAN X
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| GeForce GT 120 Mac Edition | | GeForce GTX TITAN X | |
|---|
| GPU Name | G96C () | vs | GM200 (GM200-400-A1) |
| Fab Process | 55 nm | vs | 28 nm |
| Die Size | 121 mm² | vs | 601 mm² |
| Transistors | 314 million | vs | 8,000 million |
| Shaders | 32 | vs | 3072 |
| Compute Units | 2 | vs | 24 |
| Core clock | 550 MHz | vs | 1000 MHz |
| ROPs | 8 | vs | 96 |
| TMUs | 16 | vs | 192 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce GT 120 Mac Edition | | GeForce GTX TITAN X | |
|---|
| Memory Type | GDDR3 | vs | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128 bit | vs | 384 bit |
| Memory Speed | 800 MHz
1600 MHz effective | vs | 1753 MHz
7012 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 512 Mb | vs | 12288 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce GT 120 Mac Edition | | GeForce GTX TITAN X | |
|---|
| TDP | 50 watts | vs | 250 watts |
| Release Date | 20 Jan 2009 | vs | 17 Mar 2015 |
GigaPixels - higher is better
GigaTexels - higher is better
GFLOPs - higher is better