GeForce GT 230 OEM vs GeForce 210 PCI
Summary
Reasons to consider GeForce GT 230 OEM |
| Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
| PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor |
Reasons to consider GeForce 210 PCI |
| 44 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce GT 230 OEM . |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
| PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor |
HWBench recommends GeForce GT 230 OEM
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| GeForce GT 230 OEM | | GeForce 210 PCI | |
|---|
| GPU Name | G92B (G92-250-B1) | vs | GT216 () |
| Fab Process | 55 nm | vs | 40 nm |
| Die Size | 260 mm² | vs | 100 mm² |
| Transistors | 754 million | vs | 486 million |
| Shaders | 96 | vs | 16 |
| Compute Units | 6 | vs | 2 |
| Core clock | 500 MHz | vs | 475 MHz |
| ROPs | 12 | vs | 4 |
| TMUs | 48 | vs | 8 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce GT 230 OEM | | GeForce 210 PCI | |
|---|
| Memory Type | DDR2 | vs | DDR2 |
| Bus Width | 192 bit | vs | 64 bit |
| Memory Speed | 500 MHz
1000 MHz effective | vs | 400 MHz
800 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 1536 Mb | vs | 512 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce GT 230 OEM | | GeForce 210 PCI | |
|---|
| TDP | 75 watts | vs | 31 watts |
| Release Date | 12 Oct 2009 | vs | 12 Oct 2009 |
GeForce GT 230 OEM
6.00 GP/s
GeForce 210 PCI
1.90 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
GeForce GT 230 OEM
24.00 GT/s
GeForce 210 PCI
3.80 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
GeForce GT 230 OEM
24.00 GB/s
GeForce 210 PCI
6.40 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
GeForce GT 230 OEM
240.00 GFLOPs
GeForce 210 PCI
35.20 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better