GeForce GT 340 OEM vs GeForce GTS 450
Summary
Reasons to consider GeForce GT 340 OEM |
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor |
Reasons to consider GeForce GTS 450 |
Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
Supports PhysX |
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Fermi), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends GeForce GTS 450
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| GeForce GT 340 OEM | | GeForce GTS 450 | |
---|
GPU Name | GT215 (GT215-301-A3) | vs | GF106 (GF106-250-KA-A1) |
Fab Process | 40 nm | vs | 40 nm |
Die Size | 144 mm² | vs | 238 mm² |
Transistors | 727 million | vs | 1,170 million |
Shaders | 96 | vs | 192 |
Compute Units | 4 | vs | 4 |
Core clock | 550 MHz | vs | 783 MHz |
ROPs | 8 | vs | 16 |
TMUs | 32 | vs | 32 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce GT 340 OEM | | GeForce GTS 450 | |
---|
Memory Type | GDDR3 | vs | GDDR5 |
Bus Width | 128 bit | vs | 128 bit |
Memory Speed | 850 MHz
1700 MHz effective | vs | 902 MHz
3608 MHz effective |
Memory Size | 1024 Mb | vs | 1024 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce GT 340 OEM | | GeForce GTS 450 | |
---|
TDP | 69 watts | vs | 106 watts |
Release Date | 2 Feb 2010 | vs | 13 Sep 2010 |
GeForce GT 340 OEM
4.40 GP/s
GeForce GTS 450
6.26 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
GeForce GT 340 OEM
17.60 GT/s
GeForce GTS 450
25.10 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
GeForce GT 340 OEM
27.20 GB/s
GeForce GTS 450
57.70 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
GeForce GT 340 OEM
257.30 GFLOPs
GeForce GTS 450
601.30 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better