GeForce GT 520 vs Radeon HD 6350
Summary
Reasons to consider GeForce GT 520 |
| Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
| Supports PhysX |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Fermi), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider Radeon HD 6350 |
| Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends GeForce GT 520
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| GeForce GT 520 | | Radeon HD 6350 | |
|---|
| GPU Name | GF119 (GF119-300-A1) | vs | Cedar (Cedar PRO) |
| Fab Process | 40 nm | vs | 40 nm |
| Die Size | 79 mm² | vs | 59 mm² |
| Transistors | 292 million | vs | 292 million |
| Shaders | 48 | vs | 80 |
| Compute Units | 1 | vs | 2 |
| Core clock | 810 MHz | vs | 650 MHz |
| ROPs | 4 | vs | 4 |
| TMUs | 8 | vs | 8 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce GT 520 | | Radeon HD 6350 | |
|---|
| Memory Type | DDR3 | vs | GDDR3 |
| Bus Width | 64 bit | vs | 64 bit |
| Memory Speed | 900 MHz
1800 MHz effective | vs | 400 MHz
800 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 1024 Mb | vs | 512 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce GT 520 | | Radeon HD 6350 | |
|---|
| TDP | 29 watts | vs | 19 watts |
| Release Date | 13 Apr 2011 | vs | 7 Feb 2011 |
GeForce GT 520
1.62 GP/s
Radeon HD 6350
2.60 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
GeForce GT 520
6.48 GT/s
Radeon HD 6350
5.20 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
GeForce GT 520
14.40 GB/s
Radeon HD 6350
6.40 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
GeForce GT 520
155.50 GFLOPs
Radeon HD 6350
104.00 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better