GeForce GT 520M vs GeForce 920M
Summary
GeForce GT 520M
100%
GeForce 920M
314%
Relative performance
Reasons to consider GeForce GT 520M |
| Supports PhysX |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Fermi), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider GeForce 920M |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
| Around 214% higher average synthetic performance. |
| Supports PhysX |
| Supports G-Sync |
| Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Kepler), there are less performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends GeForce 920M
The GeForce 920M is the better performing card based on the synthetic benchmarks used (1 benchmarks).
Core Configuration
| GeForce GT 520M | | GeForce 920M | |
|---|
| GPU Name | GF119 (N12P-GV-B-A1) | vs | GK208 (N16V-GM) |
| Fab Process | 40 nm | vs | 28 nm |
| Die Size | 79 mm² | vs | 87 mm² |
| Transistors | 292 million | vs | unknown |
| Shaders | 48 | vs | 384 |
| Compute Units | 1 | vs | 2 |
| Core clock | 740 MHz | vs | 954 MHz |
| ROPs | 4 | vs | 16 |
| TMUs | 8 | vs | 32 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce GT 520M | | GeForce 920M | |
|---|
| Memory Type | DDR3 | vs | DDR3 |
| Bus Width | 64 bit | vs | 64 bit |
| Memory Speed | 800 MHz
1600 MHz effective | vs | 900 MHz
1800 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 1024 Mb | vs | 2048 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce GT 520M | | GeForce 920M | |
|---|
| TDP | 12 watts | vs | 33 watts |
| Release Date | 5 Jan 2011 | vs | 13 Mar 2015 |
GeForce GT 520M
1.48 GP/s
GeForce 920M
7.63 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
GeForce GT 520M
5.92 GT/s
GeForce 920M
30.53 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
GeForce GT 520M
12.80 GB/s
GeForce 920M
14.40 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
GeForce GT 520M
142.08 GFLOPs
GeForce 920M
732.70 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better
GeForce GT 520M
550
GeForce 920M
1730
Points (higher is better)