GeForce GT 520MX vs GeForce GTX 950M
Summary
Reasons to consider GeForce GT 520MX |
| 55 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce GTX 950M . |
| Supports PhysX |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Fermi), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 950M |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
| Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
| Supports PhysX |
| Supports G-Sync |
| Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Maxwell), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends GeForce GTX 950M
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| GeForce GT 520MX | | GeForce GTX 950M | |
|---|
| GPU Name | GF119 (N12P-GVR-B-A1) | vs | GM107 (N16P-GT) |
| Fab Process | 40 nm | vs | 28 nm |
| Die Size | 79 mm² | vs | 148 mm² |
| Transistors | 292 million | vs | 1,870 million |
| Shaders | 48 | vs | 640 |
| Compute Units | 1 | vs | 5 |
| Core clock | 900 MHz | vs | 993 MHz |
| ROPs | 4 | vs | 16 |
| TMUs | 8 | vs | 40 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce GT 520MX | | GeForce GTX 950M | |
|---|
| Memory Type | DDR3 | vs | DDR3 |
| Bus Width | 64 bit | vs | 128 bit |
| Memory Speed | 900 MHz
1800 MHz effective | vs | 900 MHz
1800 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 1024 Mb | vs | 4096 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce GT 520MX | | GeForce GTX 950M | |
|---|
| TDP | 20 watts | vs | 75 watts |
| Release Date | 30 May 2011 | vs | 13 Mar 2015 |
GeForce GT 520MX
1.80 GP/s
GeForce GTX 950M
15.89 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
GeForce GT 520MX
7.20 GT/s
GeForce GTX 950M
39.70 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
GeForce GT 520MX
14.40 GB/s
GeForce GTX 950M
28.80 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
GeForce GT 520MX
172.80 GFLOPs
GeForce GTX 950M
1271.00 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better