GeForce GT 620 vs Radeon HD 8490 OEM
Summary
Reasons to consider GeForce GT 620 |
Supports PhysX |
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Fermi), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider Radeon HD 8490 OEM |
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
No clear winner declared
We have no data to declare a winner at this time.
Core Configuration
| GeForce GT 620 | | Radeon HD 8490 OEM | |
---|
GPU Name | GF108 (GF108-100-KB-A1) | vs | Caicos (Caicos XTX) |
Fab Process | 40 nm | vs | 40 nm |
Die Size | 116 mm² | vs | 67 mm² |
Transistors | 585 million | vs | 370 million |
Shaders | 96 | vs | 160 |
Compute Units | 2 | vs | 2 |
Core clock | 700 MHz | vs | 875 MHz |
ROPs | 4 | vs | 4 |
TMUs | 16 | vs | 8 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce GT 620 | | Radeon HD 8490 OEM | |
---|
Memory Type | DDR3 | vs | DDR3 |
Bus Width | 64 bit | vs | 64 bit |
Memory Speed | 900 MHz
1800 MHz effective | vs | 900 MHz
1800 MHz effective |
Memory Size | 1024 Mb | vs | 1024 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce GT 620 | | Radeon HD 8490 OEM | |
---|
TDP | 49 watts | vs | 35 watts |
Release Date | 15 May 2012 | vs | 23 Jul 2013 |
GeForce GT 620
2.80 GP/s
Radeon HD 8490 OEM
3.50 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
GeForce GT 620
11.20 GT/s
Radeon HD 8490 OEM
7.00 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
GeForce GT 620
14.40 GB/s
Radeon HD 8490 OEM
14.40 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
GeForce GT 620
268.80 GFLOPs
Radeon HD 8490 OEM
280.00 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better