GeForce GT 620M vs Radeon R5 M335

GeForce GT 620M
Memory: 1024Mb DDR3MOBILE
Release date: 23 Aug 2012
GeForce GT 620M
Radeon R5 M335
Memory: 2048Mb DDR3MOBILE
Release date: 21 Oct 2015
Radeon R5 M335

Summary

Reasons to consider GeForce GT 620M

Supports PhysX
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Fermi), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications

Reasons to consider Radeon R5 M335

This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support.
Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications.
Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute
Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty)
Supports Mantle
Based on an outdated architecture (AMD GCN), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications

Radeon R5 M335

HWBench recommends Radeon R5 M335

Based on theoretical specifications.


Specifications

Core Configuration

GeForce GT 620MRadeon R5 M335
GPU NameGF108 (N13P-GLP-A1)vsExo ()
Fab Process40 nmvs28 nm
Die Size116 mm²vs77 mm²
Transistors585 millionvs1,040 million
Shaders96vs320
Compute Units2vs5
Core clock660 MHzvs1070 MHz
ROPs4vs8
TMUs16vs20

Memory Configuration

GeForce GT 620MRadeon R5 M335
Memory TypeDDR3vsDDR3
Bus Width128 bitvs64 bit
Memory Speed900 MHz
1800 MHz effective
vs900 MHz
1800 MHz effective
Memory Size1024 Mbvs2048 Mb

Additional details

GeForce GT 620MRadeon R5 M335
TDP15 wattsvs0 watts
Release Date23 Aug 2012vs21 Oct 2015

Raw Performance comparison

Pixel Rate

  • GeForce GT 620M
    2.64 GP/s
  • Radeon R5 M335
    8.56 GP/s

GigaPixels - higher is better

Texel Rate

  • GeForce GT 620M
    10.56 GT/s
  • Radeon R5 M335
    21.40 GT/s

GigaTexels - higher is better

Memory bandwidth

  • GeForce GT 620M
    28.80 GB/s
  • Radeon R5 M335
    14.40 GB/s

GB/s - higher is better

Single precision performance

  • GeForce GT 620M
    253.44 GFLOPs
  • Radeon R5 M335
    684.80 GFLOPs

GFLOPs - higher is better

Similar comparisons