GeForce GT 630M vs Radeon R5 M320

GeForce GT 630M
Memory: 2048Mb GDDR5MOBILE
Release date: 22 Mar 2012
GeForce GT 630M
Radeon R5 M320
Memory: 4096Mb DDR3MOBILE
Release date: 5 May 2015
Radeon R5 M320

Summary

Reasons to consider GeForce GT 630M

Supports PhysX
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Fermi), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications

Reasons to consider Radeon R5 M320

This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support.
Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications.
Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute
Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty)
Supports Mantle
Based on an outdated architecture (AMD GCN), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications

Radeon R5 M320

HWBench recommends Radeon R5 M320

Based on theoretical specifications.


Specifications

Core Configuration

GeForce GT 630MRadeon R5 M320
GPU NameGF117 (N13P-GL-A1)vsJet (Jet PRO)
Fab Process28 nmvs28 nm
Die Size116 mm²vs77 mm²
Transistors585 millionvs1,040 million
Shaders96vs320
Compute Units2vs5
Core clock800 MHzvs780 MHz
ROPs4vs8
TMUs16vs20

Memory Configuration

GeForce GT 630MRadeon R5 M320
Memory TypeGDDR5vsDDR3
Bus Width128 bitvs64 bit
Memory Speed900 MHz
3600 MHz effective
vs1000 MHz
2000 MHz effective
Memory Size2048 Mbvs4096 Mb

Additional details

GeForce GT 630MRadeon R5 M320
TDP33 wattsvs0 watts
Release Date22 Mar 2012vs5 May 2015

Raw Performance comparison

Pixel Rate

  • GeForce GT 630M
    3.20 GP/s
  • Radeon R5 M320
    6.84 GP/s

GigaPixels - higher is better

Texel Rate

  • GeForce GT 630M
    12.80 GT/s
  • Radeon R5 M320
    17.10 GT/s

GigaTexels - higher is better

Memory bandwidth

  • GeForce GT 630M
    57.60 GB/s
  • Radeon R5 M320
    16.00 GB/s

GB/s - higher is better

Single precision performance

  • GeForce GT 630M
    307.20 GFLOPs
  • Radeon R5 M320
    547.20 GFLOPs

GFLOPs - higher is better

Similar comparisons