GeForce GT 635M vs GeForce GT 630M

GeForce GT 635M
Memory: 2048Mb DDR3MOBILE
Release date: 22 Mar 2012
GeForce GT 635M
GeForce GT 630M
Memory: 2048Mb GDDR5MOBILE
Release date: 22 Mar 2012
GeForce GT 630M

Summary

Synthetic performance index

  • GeForce GT 635M
    100%
  • GeForce GT 630M
    100%

Relative performance

Reasons to consider GeForce GT 635M

Supports PhysX
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Fermi), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications

Reasons to consider GeForce GT 630M

Supports PhysX
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Fermi), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications

No clear winner declared

These graphics cards seems to have comparable performance based on the synthetic benchmarks used (1 combinations of games and resolutions).


Specifications

Core Configuration

GeForce GT 635MGeForce GT 630M
GPU NameGF116 (N12E-GE2-A1)vsGF117 (N13P-GL-A1)
Fab Process40 nmvs28 nm
Die Size238 mm²vs116 mm²
Transistors1,170 millionvs585 million
Shaders144vs96
Compute Units3vs2
Core clock650 MHzvs800 MHz
ROPs16vs4
TMUs24vs16

Memory Configuration

GeForce GT 635MGeForce GT 630M
Memory TypeDDR3vsGDDR5
Bus Width128 bitvs128 bit
Memory Speed900 MHz
1800 MHz effective
vs900 MHz
3600 MHz effective
Memory Size2048 Mbvs2048 Mb

Additional details

GeForce GT 635MGeForce GT 630M
TDP35 wattsvs33 watts
Release Date22 Mar 2012vs22 Mar 2012

Raw Performance comparison

Pixel Rate

  • GeForce GT 635M
    3.90 GP/s
  • GeForce GT 630M
    3.20 GP/s

GigaPixels - higher is better

Texel Rate

  • GeForce GT 635M
    15.60 GT/s
  • GeForce GT 630M
    12.80 GT/s

GigaTexels - higher is better

Memory bandwidth

  • GeForce GT 635M
    28.80 GB/s
  • GeForce GT 630M
    57.60 GB/s

GB/s - higher is better

Single precision performance

  • GeForce GT 635M
    388.80 GFLOPs
  • GeForce GT 630M
    307.20 GFLOPs

GFLOPs - higher is better

Synthetic benchmarks

3DMark 11

  • GeForce GT 635M
    1060
  • GeForce GT 630M
    1060

Points (higher is better)

Similar comparisons