GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand vs Radeon HD 7510 OEM
Summary
Reasons to consider GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand |
| Supports PhysX |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Fermi), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider Radeon HD 7510 OEM |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
| Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
No clear winner declared
We have no data to declare a winner at this time.
Core Configuration
| GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand | | Radeon HD 7510 OEM | |
|---|
| GPU Name | GF116 (GF116-150-A1) | vs | Turks (Turks LE) |
| Fab Process | 40 nm | vs | 40 nm |
| Die Size | 238 mm² | vs | 118 mm² |
| Transistors | 1,170 million | vs | 716 million |
| Shaders | 144 | vs | 320 |
| Compute Units | 3 | vs | 4 |
| Core clock | 720 MHz | vs | 650 MHz |
| ROPs | 24 | vs | 4 |
| TMUs | 24 | vs | 16 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand | | Radeon HD 7510 OEM | |
|---|
| Memory Type | DDR3 | vs | GDDR3 |
| Bus Width | 192 bit | vs | 128 bit |
| Memory Speed | 800 MHz
1600 MHz effective | vs | 667 MHz
1334 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 1536 Mb | vs | 1024 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand | | Radeon HD 7510 OEM | |
|---|
| TDP | 75 watts | vs | 39 watts |
| Release Date | 24 Apr 2012 | vs | 1 Feb 2013 |
GigaPixels - higher is better
GigaTexels - higher is better
GFLOPs - higher is better