GeForce GT 730 OEM vs Radeon HD 6670
Summary
GeForce GT 730 OEM
100%
Radeon HD 6670
125%
Relative performance
Reasons to consider GeForce GT 730 OEM |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
| Supports PhysX |
| Supports G-Sync |
| Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Kepler), there are less performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider Radeon HD 6670 |
| Around 25% higher average synthetic performance. |
| Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends Radeon HD 6670
The Radeon HD 6670 is the better performing card based on the synthetic benchmarks used (1 benchmarks).
Core Configuration
| GeForce GT 730 OEM | | Radeon HD 6670 | |
|---|
| GPU Name | GK107 () | vs | Turks (Turks XT) |
| Fab Process | 28 nm | vs | 40 nm |
| Die Size | 118 mm² | vs | 118 mm² |
| Transistors | 1,270 million | vs | 716 million |
| Shaders | 384 | vs | 480 |
| Compute Units | 2 | vs | 6 |
| Core clock | 993 MHz | vs | 800 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | vs | 8 |
| TMUs | 32 | vs | 24 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce GT 730 OEM | | Radeon HD 6670 | |
|---|
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | vs | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128 bit | vs | 128 bit |
| Memory Speed | 1250 MHz
5000 MHz effective | vs | 1000 MHz
4000 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 1024 Mb | vs | 1024 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce GT 730 OEM | | Radeon HD 6670 | |
|---|
| TDP | 64 watts | vs | 66 watts |
| Release Date | 9 Apr 2015 | vs | 19 Apr 2011 |
GeForce GT 730 OEM
7.94 GP/s
Radeon HD 6670
6.40 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
GeForce GT 730 OEM
31.80 GT/s
Radeon HD 6670
19.20 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
GeForce GT 730 OEM
80.00 GB/s
Radeon HD 6670
64.00 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
GeForce GT 730 OEM
762.60 GFLOPs
Radeon HD 6670
768.00 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better
GeForce GT 730 OEM
1560
Radeon HD 6670
1960
Points (higher is better)