GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition vs Radeon HD 6970M
Summary
Reasons to consider GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition |
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
Supports PhysX |
Supports G-Sync |
Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Kepler), there are less performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider Radeon HD 6970M |
Around 13% higher average synthetic performance. |
Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends Radeon HD 6970M
The Radeon HD 6970M is the better performing card based on the synthetic benchmarks used (1 benchmarks).
Core Configuration
| GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition | | Radeon HD 6970M | |
---|
GPU Name | GK107 (GT 755M) | vs | Blackcomb (Blackcomb XT) |
Fab Process | 28 nm | vs | 40 nm |
Die Size | 118 mm² | vs | 212 mm² |
Transistors | 1,270 million | vs | 1,700 million |
Shaders | 384 | vs | 960 |
Compute Units | 2 | vs | 12 |
Core clock | 1085 MHz | vs | 680 MHz |
ROPs | 16 | vs | 32 |
TMUs | 32 | vs | 48 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition | | Radeon HD 6970M | |
---|
Memory Type | GDDR5 | vs | GDDR5 |
Bus Width | 128 bit | vs | 256 bit |
Memory Speed | 1250 MHz
5000 MHz effective | vs | 900 MHz
3600 MHz effective |
Memory Size | 1024 Mb | vs | 1024 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition | | Radeon HD 6970M | |
---|
TDP | 50 watts | vs | 75 watts |
Release Date | 8 Nov 2013 | vs | 4 Jan 2011 |
GigaPixels - higher is better
GigaTexels - higher is better
GFLOPs - higher is better
Points (higher is better)