GeForce GT 820M vs Radeon R5 M330
Summary
GeForce GT 820M
100%
Radeon R5 M330
118%
Relative performance
Reasons to consider GeForce GT 820M |
Supports PhysX |
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Fermi), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider Radeon R5 M330 |
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
Around 18% higher average synthetic performance. |
Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
Supports Mantle |
Based on an outdated architecture (AMD GCN), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends Radeon R5 M330
The Radeon R5 M330 is the better performing card based on the synthetic benchmarks used (1 benchmarks).
Core Configuration
| GeForce GT 820M | | Radeon R5 M330 | |
---|
GPU Name | GF117 (N15V-GM) | vs | Exo (Exo PRO) |
Fab Process | 28 nm | vs | 28 nm |
Die Size | 116 mm² | vs | 77 mm² |
Transistors | 585 million | vs | 1,040 million |
Shaders | 96 | vs | 320 |
Compute Units | 2 | vs | 5 |
Core clock | 775 MHz | vs | 955 MHz |
ROPs | 8 | vs | 8 |
TMUs | 16 | vs | 20 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce GT 820M | | Radeon R5 M330 | |
---|
Memory Type | DDR3 | vs | DDR3 |
Bus Width | 64 bit | vs | 64 bit |
Memory Speed | 900 MHz
1800 MHz effective | vs | 900 MHz
1800 MHz effective |
Memory Size | 1024 Mb | vs | 2048 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce GT 820M | | Radeon R5 M330 | |
---|
TDP | 15 watts | vs | 18 watts |
Release Date | 27 Nov 2013 | vs | 5 May 2015 |
GeForce GT 820M
3.10 GP/s
Radeon R5 M330
8.24 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
GeForce GT 820M
12.40 GT/s
Radeon R5 M330
20.60 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
GeForce GT 820M
14.40 GB/s
Radeon R5 M330
14.40 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
GeForce GT 820M
297.60 GFLOPs
Radeon R5 M330
659.20 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better
GeForce GT 820M
1200
Radeon R5 M330
1420
Points (higher is better)