GeForce GTS 450 vs Radeon R7 240 (HD 8570 rebrand)
Summary
Reasons to consider GeForce GTS 450 |
Around 15% higher average synthetic performance. |
Supports PhysX |
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Fermi), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider Radeon R7 240 (HD 8570 rebrand) |
56 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce GTS 450 . |
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
Supports Mantle |
Based on an outdated architecture (AMD GCN), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends GeForce GTS 450
The GeForce GTS 450 is the better performing card based on the synthetic benchmarks used (1 benchmarks).
Core Configuration
| GeForce GTS 450 | | Radeon R7 240 (HD 8570 rebrand) | |
---|
GPU Name | GF106 (GF106-250-KA-A1) | vs | Oland () |
Fab Process | 40 nm | vs | 28 nm |
Die Size | 238 mm² | vs | 90 mm² |
Transistors | 1,170 million | vs | 1,040 million |
Shaders | 192 | vs | 320 |
Compute Units | 4 | vs | 5 |
Core clock | 783 MHz | vs | 730 MHz |
ROPs | 16 | vs | 8 |
TMUs | 32 | vs | 20 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce GTS 450 | | Radeon R7 240 (HD 8570 rebrand) | |
---|
Memory Type | GDDR5 | vs | DDR3 |
Bus Width | 128 bit | vs | 128 bit |
Memory Speed | 902 MHz
3608 MHz effective | vs | 900 MHz
1800 MHz effective |
Memory Size | 1024 Mb | vs | 2048 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce GTS 450 | | Radeon R7 240 (HD 8570 rebrand) | |
---|
TDP | 106 watts | vs | 50 watts |
Release Date | 13 Sep 2010 | vs | 1 Nov 2013 |
GigaPixels - higher is better
GigaTexels - higher is better
GFLOPs - higher is better
Points (higher is better)