GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB vs Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition
Summary
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB |
| 125 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition . |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
| Supports PhysX |
| Supports G-Sync |
| Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Pascal), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition |
| Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
| Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Supports Mantle |
| Based on an outdated architecture (AMD GCN), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
No clear winner declared
We have no data to declare a winner at this time.
Core Configuration
| GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB | | Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition | |
|---|
| GPU Name | GP107 (GP107-301-A1) | vs | Tahiti (Tahiti PRO) |
| Fab Process | 14 nm | vs | 28 nm |
| Die Size | 132 mm² | vs | 352 mm² |
| Transistors | 3,300 million | vs | 4,313 million |
| Shaders | 768 | vs | 1792 |
| Compute Units | 6 | vs | 28 |
| Core clock | 1392 MHz | vs | 800 MHz |
| ROPs | 24 | vs | 32 |
| TMUs | 48 | vs | 112 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB | | Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition | |
|---|
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | vs | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 96 bit | vs | 384 bit |
| Memory Speed | 1752 MHz
7008 MHz effective | vs | 1250 MHz
5000 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 3072 Mb | vs | 3072 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB | | Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition | |
|---|
| TDP | 75 watts | vs | 200 watts |
| Release Date | 21 May 2018 | vs | 7 Mar 2013 |
GigaPixels - higher is better
GigaTexels - higher is better
GFLOPs - higher is better