GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile vs Radeon E9550 MXM
Summary
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile |
| Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
| Supports PhysX |
| Supports G-Sync |
| Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Pascal), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider Radeon E9550 MXM |
| Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
| Supports FreeSync |
| Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Supports TrueAudio |
| Based on an outdated architecture (AMD GCN), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile | | Radeon E9550 MXM | |
|---|
| GPU Name | GP107 () | vs | Ellesmere (Ellesmere XT) |
| Fab Process | 14 nm | vs | 14 nm |
| Die Size | 132 mm² | vs | 232 mm² |
| Transistors | 3,300 million | vs | 5,700 million |
| Shaders | 768 | vs | 2304 |
| Compute Units | 6 | vs | 36 |
| Core clock | 1490 MHz | vs | 1120 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | vs | 32 |
| TMUs | 48 | vs | 144 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile | | Radeon E9550 MXM | |
|---|
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | vs | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128 bit | vs | 256 bit |
| Memory Speed | 1752 MHz
7008 MHz effective | vs | 2000 MHz
8000 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 4096 Mb | vs | 8192 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile | | Radeon E9550 MXM | |
|---|
| TDP | 75 watts | vs | 95 watts |
| Release Date | 3 Nov 2016 | vs | 27 Sep 2016 |
GigaPixels - higher is better
GigaTexels - higher is better
GFLOPs - higher is better