GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile vs Radeon R9 270
Summary
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile |
| 75 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the Radeon R9 270 . |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
| Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
| Supports PhysX |
| Supports G-Sync |
| Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Pascal), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider Radeon R9 270 |
| Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
| Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Supports Mantle |
| Based on an outdated architecture (AMD GCN), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile | | Radeon R9 270 | |
|---|
| GPU Name | GP107 () | vs | Curacao (Curacao PRO) |
| Fab Process | 14 nm | vs | 28 nm |
| Die Size | 132 mm² | vs | 212 mm² |
| Transistors | 3,300 million | vs | 2,800 million |
| Shaders | 768 | vs | 1280 |
| Compute Units | 6 | vs | 20 |
| Core clock | 1490 MHz | vs | 900 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | vs | 32 |
| TMUs | 48 | vs | 80 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile | | Radeon R9 270 | |
|---|
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | vs | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128 bit | vs | 256 bit |
| Memory Speed | 1752 MHz
7008 MHz effective | vs | 1400 MHz
5600 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 4096 Mb | vs | 2048 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile | | Radeon R9 270 | |
|---|
| TDP | 75 watts | vs | 150 watts |
| Release Date | 3 Nov 2016 | vs | 13 Nov 2013 |
GigaPixels - higher is better
GigaTexels - higher is better
GFLOPs - higher is better