GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition
Summary
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 1050 Ti |
| 144 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition . |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
| Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
| Supports PhysX |
| Supports G-Sync |
| Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Pascal), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
| PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor |
HWBench recommends GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | | GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition | |
|---|
| GPU Name | GP107 (GP107-400-A1) | vs | GT200B (G200-105-B3) |
| Fab Process | 14 nm | vs | 55 nm |
| Die Size | 132 mm² | vs | 470 mm² |
| Transistors | 3,300 million | vs | 1,400 million |
| Shaders | 768 | vs | 240 |
| Compute Units | 6 | vs | 10 |
| Core clock | 1290 MHz | vs | 633 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | vs | 28 |
| TMUs | 48 | vs | 80 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | | GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition | |
|---|
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | vs | GDDR3 |
| Bus Width | 128 bit | vs | 448 bit |
| Memory Speed | 1752 MHz
7008 MHz effective | vs | 1134 MHz
2268 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 4096 Mb | vs | 896 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | | GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition | |
|---|
| TDP | 75 watts | vs | 219 watts |
| Release Date | 25 Oct 2016 | vs | 16 Feb 2010 |
GigaPixels - higher is better
GigaTexels - higher is better
GFLOPs - higher is better